BL-2024-001089

High Court (Chancery Division)

https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/legal

BL-2024-001089

N5A Relief from Forfeiture

STAYED (VOID MHCM ORDERS) MHCM Affected

Court

High Court (Chancery Division)

Case Number

BL-2024-001089

Claimant

Michael Darius Eastwood (Representative)

Defendant

Chelsea Harbour Ltd (R1)

Filed

29.07.2024

Quantum

Damages to be assessed by the court

Days in Default

540++

Next Step

Administrative Regularisation / Default Judgment

Notes

Subject to void LCRO and costs orders sealed during MHCM. No Defence filed for 540+ days. N227 request and N244 application both undetermined. Chelsea quantum to be assessed by the court after liability is established.

Grounds (28)

G-A1

MHCM Statutory Nullity

10 orders made during the Mental Health Crisis Moratorium (28 Dec 2024 to 16 Apr 2025) are void ab initio under Regulation 7(12) DSRR 2020. Each order is void not merely because of when it was made but because of what it contains and what it does. The DDJ Wood order (6 January 2025, MHCM Day 9) fraudulently inserted costs "forthwith GBP 22,528" (enforcement), an unless strike-out (conditional enforcement), and a retrospective extension validating the late Defence. The Master Kaye costs stay (6 February 2025, MHCM Day 40) conditioned the proceedings on payment of void costs (enforcement of debt). Every order that depends on or follows from the 6 February costs stay is also void as a derivative nullity. The LCRO (27 February 2025, MHCM Day 61) restricts the debtor's access to the court (enforcement). The TWM certifications are enforcement acts. The statutory prohibition is mandatory and admits no discretion.

LOCKED

G-A4

CPR 40.12 Breach (Fabricated Order Terms)

Two sealed orders contain terms not pronounced at any hearing. DDJ Wood (06.01.2025, BL-2024-001166 (former County Court ref L10CL352), MHCM Day 9): costs 'reserved' at hearing sealed as 'forthwith 22,528' with strike-out of Mastermind Group Ltd as Second Claimant added (only possible because Master Clark's void transfer had split the single claimant into two parties). DM Glover (18.09.2024, BL-2024-001089): sealed order contains unpronounced directions restricting evidence, interim stay of ALL applications (no application made), bundle ban, and forced name change/claim split under threat of strike-out. 3 reasonable adjustment requests denied at the hearing. Undisclosed material used. Glover order is VOID on 4 independent grounds: (1) CPR 40.12 fabricated terms; (2) CPR 23.1 no application; (3) EA 2010 s.20 RA failure; (4) natural justice breach (Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40). Reclassified from VOIDABLE to VOID 24.03.2026.

LOCKED

G-A5

LCRO Void (MHCM Period)

The Chancery Division LCRO of 27 Feb 2025, imposed by Master Kaye on BL-2024-001089 alone, was made on Day 61 of the MHCM. It was imposed by the same judge the Claimant had complained about 7 days earlier. It is void ab initio under Reg 7(12) as it constitutes enforcement action during the moratorium. The proceedings were undefended (no defence filed for 540+ days). Any further Chancery Division filing risks escalation to a General Civil Restraint Order (GCRO).

LOCKED

G-A6

LCRO Void (Apparent Bias)

The Chancery Division LCRO on BL-2024-001089 was imposed by Master Kaye 7 days after a formal complaint against her. The same judge who was the subject of the complaint imposed the order on undefended proceedings (no defence filed for 540+ days). The ruling at para 41 expressly cites the complaint as evidence of 'persistence.' A fair-minded observer would conclude there was a real possibility of bias. CROs disproportionately target litigants in person. Any further Chancery Division filing risks a GCRO.

LOCKED

G-A7

LCRO Void (Procedural Unfairness)

The cluster of 27 Feb 2025 orders was made ex parte without notice or opportunity to be heard. No CPR 3.3(5)(b) notification. No CPR 3.11 warning before CRO. Violates Lord Leggatt's Rule One (Potanina).

LOCKED

G-A8

LCRO Void (Disproportionate)

No lesser sanctions considered before imposing a 2-year Chancery Division LCRO on BL-2024-001089 alone. Imposed by the same judge the Claimant had complained about 7 days earlier, on undefended proceedings (no defence filed for 540+ days). No costs warning, no extended CRO. The nuclear option applied without proportionality analysis. TWM count arguably incorrect (N460 refused a non-existent application). Any further Chancery Division filing risks escalation to a GCRO.

LOCKED

G-A9

Default Judgment Entitlement

R1 (Chelsea Harbour) 540+ days in default. No Defence filed. N227 request and N244 application both undetermined. R2/R3 (LRP/Vista) Defence filed 27 days late in a court without jurisdiction (the County Court, following the void transfer of BL-2024-001166), without CPR 3.9 relief or Denton analysis. The court granted substantive relief to defaulting defendants without first determining the anterior Part 12 / Part 23 issue.

LOCKED

G-A11

EA 2010 Discrimination

Systematic discrimination arising from disability (s.15), failure to make reasonable adjustments (s.20), discrimination in provision of services (s.29), and breach of Public Sector Equality Duty (s.149) across all proceedings.

LOCKED

G-A12

Reasonable Adjustments Denied (0/12)

12 reasonable adjustment requests across all courts; 0 granted. 100% refusal rate. No evidence of any PD 1A consideration at any hearing. Rolls Building disability framework conceived around physical access only; neurodivergent conditions invisible.

LOCKED

G-A13

Procedural Unfairness (Cumulative)

The totality of irregularities (29:0 adverse ratio, MHCM void orders, PD 1A denial, complaint weaponisation, TWM clustering, transcript denial) renders the proceedings fundamentally unfair under Article 6 ECHR.

LOCKED

JR-2

Transcript Obstruction (5+ Formal EX107s + Informal RA Requests, 0 Transcripts)

At least 5 formal EX107 transcript applications filed across multiple courts, plus further informal requests as reasonable adjustments. Not a single full transcript provided in over 200 days. Rolls Building ignored applications. County Court returned forms addressed to 'Mr Darius'. Hearings requiring transcripts: 18 Sep 2024 (DM Glover), 25 Sep 2024 (ICC Judge Greenwood, informal RA), 20 Dec 2024 (DDJ Wood), 4 Dec 2024 (ICC Judge Prentis, informal RA), 6 Feb 2025 (Master Kaye), 19 Aug 2025 (Recorder Cohen). Without transcripts, appeals cannot proceed.

LOCKED

JR-7

29:0 Adverse Decision Ratio

28 consecutive adverse decisions (21 judicial + 7 institutional) against a disabled LiP with defendants in default. Probability of occurring by chance: 1 in 536,870,912. No rational decision-making process could produce this outcome.

LOCKED

JR-8

16 Substantive Emails Ignored

16 substantive emails sent to multiple court addresses across all proceedings. Not a single substantive response. Emails included MHCM notification, default judgment requests, RA requests, and complaints.

LOCKED

JR-10

No Investigation of Ross False Statements

Steven Ross (Harold Benjamin LLP) made 4 false statements across 2 courts: 3 in witness statements, 1 in pleading ('changing the locks' vs WhatsApp + transcript showing 'padlocked'). Plus 1,336-page misleading bundle and enforcement during MHCM. No SRA investigation.

LOCKED

JR-11

17 Orders Without CPR 23.1 Applications

17 orders granted to defendants or against the Applicant without any CPR 23.1 application notice being filed. Made on court's own initiative or at oral request, without service, and in several instances during MHCM.

LOCKED

JR-14

No Investigation of Counsel Conduct During MHCM

Whether counsel participated in ex parte applications during MHCM period. Core Duties 1, 3, 5 engaged. Rules rC3, rC4. Conditional/investigatory pending SAR results.

LOCKED

JR-16

Article 6 (Denial of Access to Justice)

Combined effect: GBP 34,528 costs barrier (R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor), Chancery Division LCRO (BL-2024-001089 only, imposed by the same judge complained about 7 days earlier on undefended proceedings) blocking applications, default judgment suppressed 540+ days, transcripts withheld preventing appeals. Closed loop: courts refuse adjustments, deny transcripts, maintain void orders.

LOCKED

JR-18

A1P1 (Deprivation of Property Through Void Proceedings)

Loss of business, office, chattels, IP, and income through enforcement of void orders. Article 1, Protocol 1 ECHR protects peaceful enjoyment of possessions.

LOCKED

JR-19

0/12 Reasonable Adjustments (100% Refusal)

12 formal RA requests across all courts. Not a single one granted. Rolls Building disability framework conceived for physical disabilities. Neurodivergent conditions do not exist in their documentation. No PD 1A reference anywhere.

LOCKED

JR-20

No PSED Consideration Evidenced

Section 149 EA 2010 imposes a duty to have due regard. No evidence of any PSED consideration at any hearing, in any order, or in any correspondence. The duty is proactive, not reactive.

LOCKED

JR-21

13+ Months Ignoring Complaint (PSED Failure)

Formal complaint filed 20 Feb 2025 against Master Kaye documenting disability discrimination. JCIO has not investigated in 13+ months. PSED requires due regard to eliminating discrimination. Ignoring complaints about discrimination is itself a PSED failure.

LOCKED

G-A19

Open Justice Violation (Anonymous Listing)

The 06.02.2025 hearing was listed as 'A v B' on the public cause list without any CPR 39.2 order authorising anonymity. No reason given. No application made. Open justice is a constitutional principle. This unexplained departure requires explanation.

LOCKED

OV-1

29:0 Adverse Decision Ratio

Supports both bias (appeal) and irrationality (JR). 28 consecutive adverse outcomes. P < 1 in 536,870,912.

LOCKED

OV-2

17 Orders Without CPR 23.1 Applications

Supports both procedural unfairness (appeal) and procedural impropriety (JR).

LOCKED

OV-4

Fabricated Order Terms

Supports both CPR 40.12 breach (appeal) and illegality (JR).

LOCKED

G-A20

No Disclosure Ever Reached

In neither BL-2024-001089 nor BL-2024-001166 was disclosure ever discussed, ordered, or conducted. Document-dependent issues (service validity, notices, lease/licence status, lockout records, disposal records) were determined summarily without disclosure. This is a compelling reason under CPR 24.2(b) why the claims should not have been disposed of before proper disclosure case management. The record was incomplete and asymmetric.

LOCKED

G-A21

Stay vs Strike-Out: Defendant's Conduct Confirms Interim Character

In BL-2024-001089, R1 applied for a stay of proceedings, not a strike-out for abuse of process under CPR 3.4(2)(b). A stay presupposes the proceedings have life. If Kelly had determined everything, the proper course was strike-out. The defendant's choice of remedy is an implicit admission Kelly was interim. Master Kaye independently confirmed this at 6 February 2025.

LOCKED

G-A22

Strict Liability Conversion (Kuwait Airways)

Chelsea Harbour sold property belonging to Michael personally and Mastermind Group Ltd for GBP 1,100 to Barrington Marketing Limited. Mastermind Promotion Ltd held the lease but is dormant with zero property rights. No itemised list provided. Sale after cease and desist letter. Strict liability conversion: Kuwait Airways v Iraqi Airways [2002] 2 AC 883. Only quantum remains. Causes of action assigned to Michael in April 2024 (pre-liquidation). Steven Ross WS admits disposal.

LOCKED

Court Orders (9)

Date	Judge	Type	Status	MHCM Day	Defects
1 October 2024	Deputy Master Glover	Directions Order	VOID		Unpronounced Terms (CPR 40.12): fabricated directions including bundle restriction; No Application (CPR 23.1): interim stay of ALL applications imposed without application; Forced Name Change/Claim Split: threatened under strike-out, party format accepted by Master Kaye, KB, and CoA; Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments (EA 2010 s.20): 3 requests denied (present case first, scheduled breaks, written submissions); Undisclosed Material (natural justice, Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40): facts not disclosed inside hearing included in sealed order; Article 6 ECHR: right to fair hearing breached (could not address undisclosed terms or facts)
5 February 2025	Master Kaye	s.130(2) Leave Refusal	VOID	Day 39	MHCM Violation; TWM Certified during Moratorium
6 February 2025	Master Kaye	Master's Ruling (Interim Payment)	VOID	Day 40	MHCM Violation; Enforcement of Debt (£12k); No Application
6 February 2025	Master Kaye	Stay & Strike Out Order	VOID	Day 40	MHCM Violation; Enforcement Mechanism (Unless Order)
20 February 2025	Master Kaye	Ex Parte Stay Dismissal	VOID	Day 54	MHCM Violation; Ex Parte Without Notice
27 February 2025	Master Kaye	Costs Order	VOID	Day 61	MHCM Violation; Porter Bias Nexus (7 days); Enforcement (£21k)
27 February 2025	Master Kaye	Limited Civil Restraint Order	VOID	Day 61	MHCM Violation; Restraint of Rights; Porter Bias Nexus
27 February 2025	Master Kaye	N460 Permission Refusal	VOID	Day 61	MHCM Violation; Enforcement Finality; Pre-emptive Refusal
27 February 2025	Master Kaye	Stay of Enforcement Order	VOID	Day 61	MHCM Violation; Refusal to Stay Enforcement

Void Cascade (MacFoy Principle)

“You cannot put something on nothing and expect it to stay there.” Per MacFoy v United Africa Co Ltd [1962] AC 152: a void act cannot found any subsequent act.

1 October 2024

Directions Order VOID

Deputy Master Glover. Unpronounced Terms (CPR 40.12): fabricated directions including bundle restriction. No Application (CPR 23.1): interim stay of ALL applications imposed without application. Forced Name Change/Claim Split: threatened under strike-out, party format accepted by Master Kaye, KB, and CoA. Failure to Make Reasonable Adjustments (EA 2010 s.20): 3 requests denied (present case first, scheduled breaks, written submissions). Undisclosed Material (natural justice, Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40): facts not disclosed inside hearing included in sealed order. Article 6 ECHR: right to fair hearing breached (could not address undisclosed terms or facts).

5 February 2025 MHCM Day 39

s.130(2) Leave Refusal VOID

Master Kaye. MHCM Violation. TWM Certified during Moratorium.

6 February 2025 MHCM Day 40

Master's Ruling (Interim Payment) VOID

Master Kaye. MHCM Violation. Enforcement of Debt (£12k). No Application.

6 February 2025 MHCM Day 40

Stay & Strike Out Order VOID

Master Kaye. MHCM Violation. Enforcement Mechanism (Unless Order).

20 February 2025 MHCM Day 54

Ex Parte Stay Dismissal VOID

Master Kaye. MHCM Violation. Ex Parte Without Notice.

27 February 2025 MHCM Day 61

Costs Order VOID

Master Kaye. MHCM Violation. Porter Bias Nexus (7 days). Enforcement (£21k).

27 February 2025 MHCM Day 61

Limited Civil Restraint Order VOID

Master Kaye. MHCM Violation. Restraint of Rights. Porter Bias Nexus.

27 February 2025 MHCM Day 61

N460 Permission Refusal VOID

Master Kaye. MHCM Violation. Enforcement Finality. Pre-emptive Refusal.

27 February 2025 MHCM Day 61

Stay of Enforcement Order VOID

Master Kaye. MHCM Violation. Refusal to Stay Enforcement.

Evidence (41)

CA-MED-003 VERIFIED

ADHD Diagnosis Evidence

Evidence of ADHD diagnosis from approximately 2014.

Relevance

Establishes protected characteristic predating all events.

CA-FIN-003 VERIFIED

Historical IP Revenue Schedule

Revenue schedule from sole trader (2014) to peak (2022). Shows 1,446% growth.

Relevance

Proves trajectory of growth destroyed by defendant conduct.

CA-FIN-007 LOCKED

Revenue Records 2014-2023

Complete revenue history. £99,373 (2017 sole trader) to £624,569 (2022 peak) to £140,327 (2023 colla

Relevance

Proves 1,446% growth trajectory and 77% collapse caused by lockouts.

CA-FIN-006 VERIFIED

Supporting Business Materials / IP Evidence

IP materials, client databases, and business assets evidence.

Relevance

Proves IP value for conversion and Wrotham Park damages.

CA-EVD-008 LOCKED

Highland House Lease/Licence Agreement

Original agreement for Unit 205. Contains unused Clause 1.2 and 5.1.

Relevance

Proves exclusive possession (Street v Mountford). Sham licence label.

CA-FIN-004 VERIFIED

DCF / Investor Evidence Supporting Valuation

Investor evidence: £600,000 commitment, £300,000 paid. Withdrawn after IP sold to competitor.

Relevance

Proves investment destroyed by Chelsea Harbour conduct.

CA-HAR-002 VERIFIED

Staff Resignation Evidence (6 Staff, Jul 2023 - Jan 2024)

Email evidence of 8 staff departures caused by business disruption from lockouts: O.L. (Sales Manager, resigned 7 Feb 2023, last day 10 Mar 2023, ET claim GBP 4,047), P.C. (Sales Consultant, withdrew 27 Feb 2023), D.M. (HR Consultant, withdrew 27 Feb 2023), T.H. (Executive Assistant, resigned 20 Jun 2023, unpaid wages), K.R. (Promotion Manager, resigned 19 Jun 2023, last working day 30 Jun 2023, mental health cited), D.M. (Assistant Promotion Manager, last day 24 Aug 2023, owed GBP 1,600), M.B. (Promotion Manager, left 5 Dec 2023 NO NOTICE, 'left with no choice', has lawyer), D.M. (Artist Success Manager, resigned 13 Dec 2023, 'lack of pay and unworkable conditions'). All dates Gmail-verified. ACAS conciliation MU102123/23 for R. & Ors.

Relevance

Proves 8 staff departed due to lockout disruption. Revenue collapsed from GBP 624,568 (2022) to GBP 140,327 (2023) to GBP 5,612 (2024). Directly caused by LRP/Vista harassment.

CA-FIN-001 LOCKED

Pitch Deck / Business Valuation (Dec 2023)

Mastermind Promotion Ltd pitch deck and business valuation showing 1,446% growth trajectory.

Relevance

Proves company value and growth destroyed by lockouts. Supports quantum.

CA-HAR-001 LOCKED

WhatsApp: 'We Padlocked But Did Not Change the Lock'

Silvia (Chelsea Harbour) admits: 'We padlocked but did not change the lock.' Invited Michael to offi

Relevance

Proves NOT peaceable re-entry. No exclusive possession taken. Forfeiture was sha

CA-EVD-003 VERIFIED

Public Listing 'A v B' Anonymisation (1)

Court listing showing 'A v B' anonymisation of Chelsea Harbour proceedings.

Relevance

Proves unauthorised anonymisation. No anonymity order exists.

CA-EVD-004 VERIFIED

Public Listing 'A v B' Anonymisation (2)

Second court listing showing 'A v B' anonymisation.

Relevance

Confirms pattern of unauthorised anonymisation.

CA-EVD-005 VERIFIED

Public Listing 'A v B' Anonymisation (3)

Third court listing showing 'A v B' anonymisation.

Relevance

Confirms pattern of unauthorised anonymisation across multiple hearings.

CA-EVD-006 VERIFIED

Default Judgment Application (N227)

N227 default judgment request. Refused due to wrong case number (originated from Shoosmiths' draft).

Relevance

Proves court adopted defendants' error then blamed applicant.

CA-FIN-002 LOCKED

DCF Schedules / Future Profit Estimate

Discounted cash flow valuation. WACC 12%, EBITDA margin 30%, NPV £11.82M.

Relevance

Quantum basis for damages claim. Wrotham Park damages methodology.

CA-FIN-005 VERIFIED

Five-Year Forecast

Five-year business forecast projections based on historic growth trend.

Relevance

Supports NPV calculation and future loss claim.

CA-FIN-013 LOCKED

Historical Revenue 2015-2022 (8 Years Verified)

Complete revenue history: £40,403 (2015) to £624,568 (2022). Total IP revenue £1,702,143. CAGR 47.9%

Relevance

Foundation for DCF valuation. 8 verified data points. Proves 1,446% growth and a

CA-MED-004 VERIFIED

Dr McDermott Report

Dr James McDermott psychiatric assessment.

Relevance

Confirms ADHD/ASD and impact on litigation capacity.

CA-PROC-001 LOCKED

Procedural Mismanagement Evidence

Compiled evidence of procedural failures across courts.

Relevance

Demonstrates pattern of institutional failures across proceedings.

CA-PROC-003 VERIFIED

Reasonable Adjustments Request Log (Chelsea)

Log of RA requests made in BL-2024-001089. 12 requests, 0 granted.

Relevance

Proves 100% RA refusal rate. EA 2010 s.20 failure.

CA-EVD-010 VERIFIED

Waiver Evidence - Post-Forfeiture Landlord Conduct

Evidence demonstrating Chelsea Harbour Ltd waived right to forfeit by continuing to treat Michael as tenant after alleged forfeiture. Includes marketing unit, maintenance notifications, "Dear Tenant" communications.

Relevance

Proves waiver of forfeiture. Chelsea Harbour continued landlord-tenant relationship after alleged forfeiture date.

CA-CORR-007 LOCKED

Marketing Unit While Lease Active

Silvia: 'We have started marketing your unit.' Michael: 'Not permissible while lease is active.'

Relevance

Repudiatory breach by landlord. Marketing while lease subsists.

CA-CORR-006 LOCKED

'Dear Tenant' Email After Alleged Forfeiture

Chelsea Harbour fire safety email addressed to 'Dear Tenant' after alleged forfeiture.

Relevance

Waiver of forfeiture. Segal Securities v Thoseby. Conduct inconsistent with forf

CA-MED-002 LOCKED

Dr Woolley Report (26 Apr 2024)

Dr James Woolley psychiatric report confirming ADHD and ASD. HMCTS RA Reference 67862925.

Relevance

Establishes protected characteristic (Equality Act 2010 s.6) and entitlement to

CA-TRN-001 VERIFIED

7 June 2024 Transcript (HHJ Kelly)

Transcript of hearing before HHJ Kelly. Only partial transcript received. 200+ days withheld.

Relevance

Proves transcript obstruction. Only 1 of at least 5 formal EX107 applications resulted in any tr

CA-TRN-003 LOCKED

HHJ Kelly Judgment Transcript (Revised by Judge)

Judgment-only transcript of 7 June 2024 hearing. Revised and edited by HHJ Kelly before release. NOT

Relevance

Contains para 50 ('remains open to bring substantive claim') which contradicts S

CA-WS-001 LOCKED

First Witness Statement of Ferdinand Steinhuber (31 Jul 2024)

Independent investor witness statement. S&S Steinhuber GmbH (Austria, €27M turnover, 80 staff). Alre

Relevance

Independent third-party validation of business viability and quantum. Proves inv

CA-CERT-021 VERIFIED

Proof of Proper Service of Chelsea Harbour Claim

Certificate proving proper service of claim on Chelsea Harbour Ltd. Counters any argument about service defects.

Relevance

Proves valid service - defeats any service objection.

CA-CERT-001 DRAFT

MHCM Certificate (BSS0000297093)

Official Mental Health Crisis Moratorium certificate covering 28 December 2024 to 16 April 2025.

Relevance

Foundational proof for statutory nullity (Reg 7(12) DSRR 2020) of all orders dur

CA-EVD-001 VERIFIED

Evidence Document (from filing)

Supporting evidence document from court filing.

Relevance

Cross-cutting evidence supporting multiple claims.

MDE-EVD-003 VERIFIED

Evidence Document (from filing)

Supporting evidence document from court filing.

Relevance

Cross-cutting evidence supporting multiple claims.

CA-PROC-002 LOCKED

Master Kaye Ruling (Feb 2025)

Full ruling. Para 37(xii): fabricated claim Michael complained about CoA. Para 141: confirms no appl

Relevance

Contains fabricated allegation at para 37(xii) and LCRO admission at para 141.

CA-CORR-008 VERIFIED

Email to a court clerk (5 Feb 2025)

Corrective material sent to Master Kaye's clerk before hearing.

Relevance

Proves Michael engaged constructively. Court ignored submissions.

CA-CORR-015 VERIFIED

Email Not Forwarded to Judge (5 Feb 2025, 10:41am)

Email sent at 10:41am on 5 February 2025 (day before Master Kaye hearing) was not forwarded to the judge. Proves court staff obstruction of LiP's submissions.

Relevance

Proves procedural unfairness - correspondence suppressed before critical hearing.

CA-PROC-007 VERIFIED

Legal Memorandum for Master Kaye Hearing (6 Feb 2025)

Claimant's Legal Memorandum and Authorities - comprehensive written submissions for the 6 February 2025 hearing before Master Kaye. Filed at 07:32am on the morning of the hearing due to 0/12 RA denials.

Relevance

Proves last-minute filing pattern. Filed at 07:32am for a morning hearing because no reasonable adjustments were granted.

CA-PROC-008 VERIFIED

Reasonable Adjustments and Bundle Issues Evidence

Evidence of reasonable adjustments requests and bundle access issues for the 6 February 2025 hearing. Documents the pattern of RA denial.

Relevance

Proves 0/12 RA pattern and bundle access inequality.

CA-CORR-001 VERIFIED

Subject Access Request (20 Feb 2025)

SAR sent to HMCTS for all records relating to the case.

Relevance

Outstanding SAR. No response received. Evidence of institutional obstruction.

CA-ORD-005 LOCKED

Sealed Order (27 Feb 2025) - Records Complaint Considered

Master Kaye sealed order recording that complaint was considered. LCRO imposed 7 days after complain

Relevance

Proves complaint-to-LCRO nexus. Apparent bias (Porter v Magill).

CA-ORD-006 LOCKED

N19 LCRO Form (27 Feb 2025)

Grepe v Loam order form. No defendant application. Master Kaye Ruling para 141 confirms this.

Relevance

LCRO imposed without any application from defendants.

CA-CORR-013 VERIFIED

Subject Access Request to Insolvency Service (10 Mar 2025)

SAR sent to the Insolvency Service under UK GDPR Art 15 for all personal data relating to CR-2024-00

Relevance

Outstanding SAR. No response received. 346+ days overdue. Records may contradict

CA-MED-001 LOCKED

Crisis Team Letter ASD (24 Mar 2025)

Crisis team letter confirming ASD diagnosis and ongoing mental health crisis.

Relevance

Confirms protected characteristic (EA 2010 s.6) and ongoing crisis during MHCM p

CA-CORR-014 VERIFIED

Subject Access Request to DWP (18 Feb 2026)

SAR filed via UC journal under UK GDPR Art 15 for all personal data from entire claim period (Feb 20

Relevance

Outstanding SAR. No response. 34+ days overdue. Case manager redirected to gener