M. D. Eastwood
/
Overview & Briefing 4
Judicial Briefing Guide for Court How the Cases Connect The Story
Orders Sought 4
Relief Sought 33 Quantum (£8.2M+ pleaded) Why One Judge Must Hear All Settlement Exposure The Costs Trap
Void Ab Initio 29:0
29 Adverse : 0 Favourable 1 in 537M 21 Void Orders (All Void) MHCM Calendar Defence Admissions Defence Contradictions Equality of Arms Filing Pattern (0/12 RA) Staff Impact (6 Resignations) Gaslighting 13
No Time Bar Applies 9 Grounds
Grounds of Voidness 23
CA-2024-001353 · s.31A SCA 1981
Appeal Overview 23 Grounds of Voidness Argument Map KB Hearing (7 June) Waiver/Estoppel
Judicial Review 12
7 bodies · 34 ECHR · permission sought
JR Targets 7 ECHR Violations 34 Institutional Failures Solicitor Misconduct Transcript Obstruction 0/12 Adjustments Granted Subject Access Requests SAR Tracker 3 overdue Pre-Action Letters Constitutional DWP Judicial Review Wheelchair Ramp
The 6 Cases 6
Chelsea Harbour Ltd (R1) Lower Richmond Properties Ltd & Vista (London) Ltd (R2, R3) Personal Damages Insolvency KB Injunction Defendants

Evidence & Documents 11
103 exhibits · 160 authorities · 1395 events
Evidence Hub Exhibits 103 Gallery Chronology 1395 Authorities 160 Key Quotes Revenue & DCF Costs Analysis OR Response + 15 Enclosures Applications All Documents
Reference & Tools 14
Ask the Case Search / Master Timeline Order Timeline CPR Heatmap CPR Dictionary Citation Index Glossary Evidence Trails Document Timeline Evidence Matrix Evidence Audit Argument Index Data Health Open Justice Assurance and Governance Health Report
🌱 Built with Eden Legal AI
✓ visited · ? shortcuts clear
CR-2024-000527
Insolvency & Companies Court (High Court)
https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/legal
Legal/Cases/CR-2024-000527
This site is published under the open justice principle. All court proceedings referenced here are matters of public record. Third-party personal data has been redacted in accordance with GDPR. Public availability here does not itself prove that a document has been filed, served, or sent. Read the full disclaimer.

CR-2024-000527

Winding Up Petition

WOUND UP (25.09.2024)
Court
Insolvency & Companies Court (High Court)
Case Number
CR-2024-000527
Defendant
Mastermind Group Ltd (In Liquidation)
Next Step
Rescission Application / Public Examination Stay
Notes

Public Examination transferred to CLCC (Ultra Vires). Needs restoration to ICC.

Grounds (19)

G-A1
MHCM Statutory Nullity
10 orders made during the Mental Health Crisis Moratorium (28 Dec 2024 to 16 Apr 2025) are void ab initio under Regulation 7(12) DSRR 2020. Each order is void not merely because of when it was made but because of what it contains and what it does. The DDJ Wood order (6 January 2025, MHCM Day 9) fraudulently inserted costs "forthwith GBP 22,528" (enforcement), an unless strike-out (conditional enforcement), and a retrospective extension validating the late Defence. The Master Kaye costs stay (6 February 2025, MHCM Day 40) conditioned the proceedings on payment of void costs (enforcement of debt). Every order that depends on or follows from the 6 February costs stay is also void as a derivative nullity. The LCRO (27 February 2025, MHCM Day 61) restricts the debtor's access to the court (enforcement). The TWM certifications are enforcement acts. The statutory prohibition is mandatory and admits no discretion.
LOCKED
G-A2
MacFoy Cascade (Derivative Nullities)
Orders founded on void MHCM orders are themselves void. The DDJ Wood order (Day 9) validated a late Defence; Cohen's summary judgment was founded on that Defence. The entire chain collapses.
LOCKED
G-A11
EA 2010 Discrimination
Systematic discrimination arising from disability (s.15), failure to make reasonable adjustments (s.20), discrimination in provision of services (s.29), and breach of Public Sector Equality Duty (s.149) across all proceedings.
LOCKED
G-A12
Reasonable Adjustments Denied (0/12)
12 reasonable adjustment requests across all courts; 0 granted. 100% refusal rate. No evidence of any PD 1A consideration at any hearing. Rolls Building disability framework conceived around physical access only; neurodivergent conditions invisible.
LOCKED
G-A13
Procedural Unfairness (Cumulative)
The totality of irregularities (29:0 adverse ratio, MHCM void orders, PD 1A denial, complaint weaponisation, TWM clustering, transcript denial) renders the proceedings fundamentally unfair under Article 6 ECHR.
LOCKED
JR-2
Transcript Obstruction (5+ Formal EX107s + Informal RA Requests, 0 Transcripts)
At least 5 formal EX107 transcript applications filed across multiple courts, plus further informal requests as reasonable adjustments. Not a single full transcript provided in over 200 days. Rolls Building ignored applications. County Court returned forms addressed to 'Mr Darius'. Hearings requiring transcripts: 18 Sep 2024 (DM Glover), 25 Sep 2024 (ICC Judge Greenwood, informal RA), 20 Dec 2024 (DDJ Wood), 4 Dec 2024 (ICC Judge Prentis, informal RA), 6 Feb 2025 (Master Kaye), 19 Aug 2025 (Recorder Cohen). Without transcripts, appeals cannot proceed.
LOCKED
JR-3
Wrong Statute (ss.290/364 Bankruptcy Applied to Company)
Arrest warrant and PE proceedings conducted under ss.290 and 364 IA 1986 (bankruptcy provisions). The company is in compulsory liquidation, not bankruptcy. The applicable provisions are ss.133 and 134 IA 1986. This is jurisdictional, not a typo.
LOCKED
JR-4
PE in Wrong Court (CLCC not ICC)
Public examination transferred to County Court at Central London. Section 117(2A) IA 1986 and Article 6C HCCJ Order 1991 provide that winding-up proceedings 'shall be commenced and proceeded with only in the High Court.'
LOCKED
JR-5
UC Sanctions from Void Winding-Up
Universal Credit closed as a consequence of a winding-up order that cascaded from void proceedings. Disability-related inability to comply with requirements imposed by void orders.
LOCKED
JR-6
Winding-Up Without RA Assessment
HMRC pursued winding-up petition without conducting a reasonable adjustment assessment for a disabled taxpayer. Mrs Huntley refused engagement on 22 Feb 2024.
LOCKED
JR-7
29:0 Adverse Decision Ratio
28 consecutive adverse decisions (21 judicial + 7 institutional) against a disabled LiP with defendants in default. Probability of occurring by chance: 1 in 536,870,912. No rational decision-making process could produce this outcome.
LOCKED
JR-8
16 Substantive Emails Ignored
16 substantive emails sent to multiple court addresses across all proceedings. Not a single substantive response. Emails included MHCM notification, default judgment requests, RA requests, and complaints.
LOCKED
JR-9
Abandoned £9.2M Claims
The Official Receiver abandoned £9.2M in claims (£4.9M LRP + £1.95M Chelsea + £2.35M personal) without investigation. Demands documents from the Applicant while simultaneously withholding them. Impossibilium nulla obligatio est.
LOCKED
JR-15
Article 5 (Arrest Warrant for Disabled Person on Void Order)
Deprivation of liberty pursuant to an arrest warrant founded on void orders. Article 5(1) ECHR requires lawful authority. A void order provides no lawful authority. Article 5(5) entitles compensation.
LOCKED
JR-16
Article 6 (Denial of Access to Justice)
Combined effect: GBP 34,528 costs barrier (R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor), Chancery Division LCRO (BL-2024-001089 only, imposed by the same judge complained about 7 days earlier on undefended proceedings) blocking applications, default judgment suppressed 540+ days, transcripts withheld preventing appeals. Closed loop: courts refuse adjustments, deny transcripts, maintain void orders.
LOCKED
JR-18
A1P1 (Deprivation of Property Through Void Proceedings)
Loss of business, office, chattels, IP, and income through enforcement of void orders. Article 1, Protocol 1 ECHR protects peaceful enjoyment of possessions.
LOCKED
JR-19
0/12 Reasonable Adjustments (100% Refusal)
12 formal RA requests across all courts. Not a single one granted. Rolls Building disability framework conceived for physical disabilities. Neurodivergent conditions do not exist in their documentation. No PD 1A reference anywhere.
LOCKED
JR-20
No PSED Consideration Evidenced
Section 149 EA 2010 imposes a duty to have due regard. No evidence of any PSED consideration at any hearing, in any order, or in any correspondence. The duty is proactive, not reactive.
LOCKED
OV-1
29:0 Adverse Decision Ratio
Supports both bias (appeal) and irrationality (JR). 28 consecutive adverse outcomes. P < 1 in 536,870,912.
LOCKED

Court Orders (5)

DateJudgeTypeStatusMHCM DayDefects
25 September 2024 ICC Judge Greenwood Winding-Up Order VOID EA 2010 s.20: No reasonable adjustments made. Claimant denied ability to submit evidence due to disability; EA 2010 s.27: Victimisation. Claimant mentioned formal complaint and JR before order made. Adverse ruling followed.; Natural Justice (Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40): Claimant denied right to present evidence. Decision made on incomplete record.; SI 2014/817 Sch 1: Wrong court for corporate insolvency (requires London High Court); Made without evidence: judge ruled without hearing Claimant's case
4 December 2024 ICC Judge Prentis Rescission Refusal DERIVATIVE NULLITY Derivative of void Greenwood winding-up order (ORD-2024-09-25). Cannot refuse to rescind a void order.; EA 2010 s.20: No reasonable adjustments assessment; MacFoy v United Africa [1962] AC 152: built on void foundation
23 July 2025 Chief ICC Judge Briggs PE Transfer Order VOID Ultra Vires (CLCC lacks Corp Insolvency Jurisdiction); Statutory Citation Error
7 August 2025 DJ Hart Public Examination Order VOID Wrong Statutory Provisions (ss.290/364 bankruptcy); Derivative of Void Transfer; County Court Lacks Jurisdiction
19 November 2025 DJ Mauger Arrest Warrant VOID Wrong Court (s.117(2A)); Wrong Statutory Provisions (ss.290/364); Outside Scope of Limited Transfer; No Service on Respondent; MHCM Derivative

Void Cascade (MacFoy Principle)

“You cannot put something on nothing and expect it to stay there.” Per MacFoy v United Africa Co Ltd [1962] AC 152: a void act cannot found any subsequent act.

25 September 2024
Winding-Up Order VOID
ICC Judge Greenwood. EA 2010 s.20: No reasonable adjustments made. Claimant denied ability to submit evidence due to disability. EA 2010 s.27: Victimisation. Claimant mentioned formal complaint and JR before order made. Adverse ruling followed.. Natural Justice (Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40): Claimant denied right to present evidence. Decision made on incomplete record.. SI 2014/817 Sch 1: Wrong court for corporate insolvency (requires London High Court). Made without evidence: judge ruled without hearing Claimant's case.
4 December 2024
Rescission Refusal DERIVATIVE NULLITY
ICC Judge Prentis. Derivative of void Greenwood winding-up order (ORD-2024-09-25). Cannot refuse to rescind a void order.. EA 2010 s.20: No reasonable adjustments assessment. MacFoy v United Africa [1962] AC 152: built on void foundation.
23 July 2025
PE Transfer Order VOID
Chief ICC Judge Briggs. Ultra Vires (CLCC lacks Corp Insolvency Jurisdiction). Statutory Citation Error.
7 August 2025
Public Examination Order VOID
DJ Hart. Wrong Statutory Provisions (ss.290/364 bankruptcy). Derivative of Void Transfer. County Court Lacks Jurisdiction.
19 November 2025
Arrest Warrant VOID
DJ Mauger. Wrong Court (s.117(2A)). Wrong Statutory Provisions (ss.290/364). Outside Scope of Limited Transfer. No Service on Respondent. MHCM Derivative.
4 December 2024
Rescission Refusal DERIVATIVE NULLITY
Fruit of the poisonous tree. Reclassified from VOIDABLE to DERIVATIVE NULLITY on 24.03.2026. The underlying Greenwood winding-up order is void (reclassified same date). A refusal to rescind a void order is itself a nullity. You cannot refuse to undo nothing. Additionally, no EA 2010 s.20 assessment was made.
7 August 2025
Public Examination Order DERIVATIVE NULLITY
Fruit of the poisonous tree. Cites bankruptcy provisions for company winding-up. Foundational defect for arrest warrant.

Evidence (25)

CA-FIN-003 VERIFIED
Historical IP Revenue Schedule
Revenue schedule from sole trader (2014) to peak (2022). Shows 1,446% growth.
Relevance

Proves trajectory of growth destroyed by defendant conduct.

CA-FIN-006 VERIFIED
Supporting Business Materials / IP Evidence
IP materials, client databases, and business assets evidence.
Relevance

Proves IP value for conversion and Wrotham Park damages.

CA-FIN-004 VERIFIED
DCF / Investor Evidence Supporting Valuation
Investor evidence: £600,000 commitment, £300,000 paid. Withdrawn after IP sold to competitor.
Relevance

Proves investment destroyed by Chelsea Harbour conduct.

CA-FIN-001 LOCKED
Pitch Deck / Business Valuation (Dec 2023)
Mastermind Promotion Ltd pitch deck and business valuation showing 1,446% growth trajectory.
Relevance

Proves company value and growth destroyed by lockouts. Supports quantum.

CA-CORR-002 LOCKED
HMRC Declining Reasonable Adjustments
HMRC letter declining to provide reasonable adjustments. Mrs Huntley refusal.
Relevance

Proves HMRC failed PSED. EA 2010 s.149 breach.

CA-FIN-002 LOCKED
DCF Schedules / Future Profit Estimate
Discounted cash flow valuation. WACC 12%, EBITDA margin 30%, NPV £11.82M.
Relevance

Quantum basis for damages claim. Wrotham Park damages methodology.

CA-FIN-005 VERIFIED
Five-Year Forecast
Five-year business forecast projections based on historic growth trend.
Relevance

Supports NPV calculation and future loss claim.

CA-PROC-001 LOCKED
Procedural Mismanagement Evidence
Compiled evidence of procedural failures across courts.
Relevance

Demonstrates pattern of institutional failures across proceedings.

CA-CORR-003 LOCKED
Letter to HMRC RA Request (21 Feb 2024)
Michael's formal letter requesting reasonable adjustments from HMRC.
Relevance

Proves RA request made. HMRC failed to comply.

CA-MED-002 LOCKED
Dr Woolley Report (26 Apr 2024)
Dr James Woolley psychiatric report confirming ADHD and ASD. HMCTS RA Reference 67862925.
Relevance

Establishes protected characteristic (Equality Act 2010 s.6) and entitlement to

CA-TRN-001 VERIFIED
7 June 2024 Transcript (HHJ Kelly)
Transcript of hearing before HHJ Kelly. Only partial transcript received. 200+ days withheld.
Relevance

Proves transcript obstruction. Only 1 of at least 5 formal EX107 applications resulted in any tr

CA-ORD-004 LOCKED
Winding-Up Order (25 Sep 2024)
Original winding-up order. Made without evidence and after Michael mentioned JR of another judge.
Relevance

ICC Judge Greenwood made order without evidence. First victimisation.

CA-EVD-002 LOCKED
OR Rescission Report (15 Nov 2024)
Official Receiver's rescission report. Abandoned £9.2M in claims.
Relevance

Proves OR abandoned viable claims worth £9.2M+.

CA-CERT-001 DRAFT
MHCM Certificate (BSS0000297093)
Official Mental Health Crisis Moratorium certificate covering 28 December 2024 to 16 April 2025.
Relevance

Foundational proof for statutory nullity (Reg 7(12) DSRR 2020) of all orders dur

CA-EVD-001 VERIFIED
Evidence Document (from filing)
Supporting evidence document from court filing.
Relevance

Cross-cutting evidence supporting multiple claims.

MDE-EVD-003 VERIFIED
Evidence Document (from filing)
Supporting evidence document from court filing.
Relevance

Cross-cutting evidence supporting multiple claims.

CA-CORR-001 VERIFIED
Subject Access Request (20 Feb 2025)
SAR sent to HMCTS for all records relating to the case.
Relevance

Outstanding SAR. No response received. Evidence of institutional obstruction.

CA-CORR-013 VERIFIED
Subject Access Request to Insolvency Service (10 Mar 2025)
SAR sent to the Insolvency Service under UK GDPR Art 15 for all personal data relating to CR-2024-00
Relevance

Outstanding SAR. No response received. 346+ days overdue. Records may contradict

CA-MED-001 LOCKED
Crisis Team Letter ASD (24 Mar 2025)
Crisis team letter confirming ASD diagnosis and ongoing mental health crisis.
Relevance

Confirms protected characteristic (EA 2010 s.6) and ongoing crisis during MHCM p

CA-ORD-001 LOCKED
Transfer Order (Briggs, 23 Jul 2025)
ICC Judge Briggs transfer order moving CR-2024-000527 from ICC to County Court.
Relevance

Transfer of winding-up proceedings. Jurisdictional questions.

CA-ORD-003 LOCKED
PE Order (DJ Hart, 7 Aug 2025)
Public examination order by DJ Hart.
Relevance

PE ordered in wrong court. Should be in ICC not County Court.

CA-ORD-002 LOCKED
Arrest Warrant (19 Nov 2025)
Warrant for arrest issued by County Court with no jurisdiction over CR-2024-000527.
Relevance

Ultra vires warrant. County Court lacks jurisdiction over ICC proceedings.

CA-CORR-005 VERIFIED
Letter to IS (23 Jan 2026, 13 pages)
Comprehensive 13-page letter to the Insolvency Service setting out full case.
Relevance

Pre-action correspondence. IS failed to respond substantively.

CA-CORR-004 VERIFIED
Wheeler Email (27 Jan 2026)
Email from Wheeler (Insolvency Service) showing non-response to Michael's correspondence.
Relevance

Evidence of institutional obstruction by IS.

CA-CORR-014 VERIFIED
Subject Access Request to DWP (18 Feb 2026)
SAR filed via UC journal under UK GDPR Art 15 for all personal data from entire claim period (Feb 20
Relevance

Outstanding SAR. No response. 34+ days overdue. Case manager redirected to gener

© 2026 Michael Darius Eastwood. Published under the open justice principle.

Legal Disclaimer · All Cases

Evidence
Open in full page