CR-2024-000527
Public Examination transferred to CLCC (Ultra Vires). Needs restoration to ICC.
| Date | Judge | Type | Status | MHCM Day | Defects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 September 2024 | ICC Judge Greenwood | Winding-Up Order | VOID | EA 2010 s.20: No reasonable adjustments made. Claimant denied ability to submit evidence due to disability; EA 2010 s.27: Victimisation. Claimant mentioned formal complaint and JR before order made. Adverse ruling followed.; Natural Justice (Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40): Claimant denied right to present evidence. Decision made on incomplete record.; SI 2014/817 Sch 1: Wrong court for corporate insolvency (requires London High Court); Made without evidence: judge ruled without hearing Claimant's case | |
| 4 December 2024 | ICC Judge Prentis | Rescission Refusal | DERIVATIVE NULLITY | Derivative of void Greenwood winding-up order (ORD-2024-09-25). Cannot refuse to rescind a void order.; EA 2010 s.20: No reasonable adjustments assessment; MacFoy v United Africa [1962] AC 152: built on void foundation | |
| 23 July 2025 | Chief ICC Judge Briggs | PE Transfer Order | VOID | Ultra Vires (CLCC lacks Corp Insolvency Jurisdiction); Statutory Citation Error | |
| 7 August 2025 | DJ Hart | Public Examination Order | VOID | Wrong Statutory Provisions (ss.290/364 bankruptcy); Derivative of Void Transfer; County Court Lacks Jurisdiction | |
| 19 November 2025 | DJ Mauger | Arrest Warrant | VOID | Wrong Court (s.117(2A)); Wrong Statutory Provisions (ss.290/364); Outside Scope of Limited Transfer; No Service on Respondent; MHCM Derivative |
“You cannot put something on nothing and expect it to stay there.” Per MacFoy v United Africa Co Ltd [1962] AC 152: a void act cannot found any subsequent act.
Proves trajectory of growth destroyed by defendant conduct.
Proves IP value for conversion and Wrotham Park damages.
Proves investment destroyed by Chelsea Harbour conduct.
Proves company value and growth destroyed by lockouts. Supports quantum.
Proves HMRC failed PSED. EA 2010 s.149 breach.
Quantum basis for damages claim. Wrotham Park damages methodology.
Supports NPV calculation and future loss claim.
Demonstrates pattern of institutional failures across proceedings.
Proves RA request made. HMRC failed to comply.
Establishes protected characteristic (Equality Act 2010 s.6) and entitlement to
Proves transcript obstruction. Only 1 of at least 5 formal EX107 applications resulted in any tr
ICC Judge Greenwood made order without evidence. First victimisation.
Proves OR abandoned viable claims worth £9.2M+.
Foundational proof for statutory nullity (Reg 7(12) DSRR 2020) of all orders dur
Cross-cutting evidence supporting multiple claims.
Cross-cutting evidence supporting multiple claims.
Outstanding SAR. No response received. Evidence of institutional obstruction.
Outstanding SAR. No response received. 346+ days overdue. Records may contradict
Confirms protected characteristic (EA 2010 s.6) and ongoing crisis during MHCM p
Transfer of winding-up proceedings. Jurisdictional questions.
PE ordered in wrong court. Should be in ICC not County Court.
Ultra vires warrant. County Court lacks jurisdiction over ICC proceedings.
Pre-action correspondence. IS failed to respond substantively.
Evidence of institutional obstruction by IS.
Outstanding SAR. No response. 34+ days overdue. Case manager redirected to gener