Winding-Up Order

• EA 2010 s.20: No reasonable adjustments made. Claimant denied ability to submit evidence due to disability
• EA 2010 s.27: Victimisation. Claimant mentioned formal complaint and JR before order made. Adverse ruling followed.
• Natural Justice (Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40): Claimant denied right to present evidence. Decision made on incomplete record.
• SI 2014/817 Sch 1: Wrong court for corporate insolvency (requires London High Court)
• Made without evidence: judge ruled without hearing Claimant's case

Reclassified from VOIDABLE to VOID on 24.03.2026. First victimisation event. Claimant told judge about formal complaint and JR. Judge did not provide reasonable adjustments for ADHD/ASD to submit evidence. Ruled against Claimant without hearing his case. 5 independent grounds for voidness: (1) EA 2010 s.20 failure to adjust; (2) EA 2010 s.27 victimisation; (3) Natural justice (Ridge v Baldwin); (4) SI 2014/817 wrong court; (5) No evidence heard. The arrest warrant, public examination, and all subsequent insolvency acts flow from this void order.