BL-2025-000147
Stayed by Master Kaye on 27.02.2025 (during MHCM) before service effected.
| Date | Judge | Type | Status | MHCM Day | Defects |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 February 2025 | Master Kaye | Pre-service Stay Order | VOID | Day 61 | MHCM Violation; Fourie Pre-service Void |
“You cannot put something on nothing and expect it to stay there.” Per MacFoy v United Africa Co Ltd [1962] AC 152: a void act cannot found any subsequent act.
Proves trajectory of growth destroyed by defendant conduct.
Proves 1,446% growth trajectory and 77% collapse caused by lockouts.
Proves IP value for conversion and Wrotham Park damages.
Proves investment destroyed by Chelsea Harbour conduct.
Proves company value and growth destroyed by lockouts. Supports quantum.
Quantum basis for damages claim. Wrotham Park damages methodology.
Supports NPV calculation and future loss claim.
Foundation for DCF valuation. 8 verified data points. Proves 1,446% growth and a
Demonstrates pattern of institutional failures across proceedings.
Establishes protected characteristic (Equality Act 2010 s.6) and entitlement to
Proves transcript obstruction. Only 1 of at least 5 formal EX107 applications resulted in any tr
Foundational proof for statutory nullity (Reg 7(12) DSRR 2020) of all orders dur
Cross-cutting evidence supporting multiple claims.
Distinct personal claim, not 'duplicate'. Stayed by void MHCM order.
Itemised quantum for personal damages claim.
Cross-cutting evidence supporting multiple claims.
Outstanding SAR. No response received. Evidence of institutional obstruction.
Outstanding SAR. No response received. 346+ days overdue. Records may contradict
Confirms protected characteristic (EA 2010 s.6) and ongoing crisis during MHCM p
Outstanding SAR. No response. 34+ days overdue. Case manager redirected to gener