M. D. Eastwood
/
Overview & Briefing 4
Judicial Briefing Guide for Court How the Cases Connect The Story
Orders Sought 4
Relief Sought 33 Quantum (£8.2M+ pleaded) Why One Judge Must Hear All Settlement Exposure The Costs Trap
Void Ab Initio 29:0
29 Adverse : 0 Favourable 1 in 537M 21 Void Orders (All Void) MHCM Calendar Defence Admissions Defence Contradictions Equality of Arms Filing Pattern (0/12 RA) Staff Impact (6 Resignations) Gaslighting 13
No Time Bar Applies 9 Grounds
Grounds of Voidness 23
CA-2024-001353 · s.31A SCA 1981
Appeal Overview 23 Grounds of Voidness Argument Map KB Hearing (7 June) Waiver/Estoppel
Judicial Review 12
7 bodies · 34 ECHR · permission sought
JR Targets 7 ECHR Violations 34 Institutional Failures Solicitor Misconduct Transcript Obstruction 0/12 Adjustments Granted Subject Access Requests SAR Tracker 3 overdue Pre-Action Letters Constitutional DWP Judicial Review Wheelchair Ramp
The 6 Cases 6
Chelsea Harbour Ltd (R1) Lower Richmond Properties Ltd & Vista (London) Ltd (R2, R3) Personal Damages Insolvency KB Injunction Defendants

Evidence & Documents 11
103 exhibits · 160 authorities · 1395 events
Evidence Hub Exhibits 103 Gallery Chronology 1395 Authorities 160 Key Quotes Revenue & DCF Costs Analysis OR Response + 15 Enclosures Applications All Documents
Reference & Tools 14
Ask the Case Search / Master Timeline Order Timeline CPR Heatmap CPR Dictionary Citation Index Glossary Evidence Trails Document Timeline Evidence Matrix Evidence Audit Argument Index Data Health Open Justice Assurance and Governance Health Report
🌱 Built with Eden Legal AI
✓ visited · ? shortcuts clear
Ground G-A9
https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/legal
Legal/Grounds/G-A9

G-A9

Default Judgment Entitlement

LOCKED NUCLEAR Priority
NUCLEAR PRIORITY
9/10
Probability
10/10
Impact
90
Priority Score

540 days. Mandatory ministerial function. Binary.

R1 (Chelsea Harbour) 540+ days in default. No Defence filed. N227 request and N244 application both undetermined. R2/R3 (LRP/Vista) Defence filed 27 days late in a court without jurisdiction (the County Court, following the void transfer of BL-2024-001166), without CPR 3.9 relief or Denton analysis. The court granted substantive relief to defaulting defendants without first determining the anterior Part 12 / Part 23 issue.

Principal Authority

CPR 12.3, 12.4; Denton v TH White Ltd [2014] 1 WLR 3926; Leadingway Consultants Ltd v Saab [2025] EWCA Civ 582; Cunico Resources NV v Daskalakis [2018] EWHC 3382 (Comm)

Supporting Evidence

Authorities (5)

  • Civil Procedure Rules r.12.3
  • Messih v McMillan Williams [2010] EWCA Civ 844
  • Billington v Davies [2017] EWHC 3009 (Ch)
  • Civil Procedure Rules r.3.9
  • Civil Procedure Rules r.15.4

Exhibits (1)

  • CA-PROC-001 Procedural Mismanagement Evidence

Counter-Arguments & Rebuttals (3)

What the opponent will argue, and why they are wrong.

Defendant · LOW Risk
They will argue

Court has discretion to refuse default judgment.

Rebuttal

CPR 12.3: 'may' confers ENTITLEMENT, not discretion (Messih v McMillan Williams [2010] EWCA Civ 844). CPR 12.5(3): entry is a MINISTERIAL function of the court officer. 540+ days of suppression is not discretion. It is maladministration. Godwin v Swindon: where conditions are met, claimant is entitled.

Authorities: AUTH-CASE-004; AUTH-CASE-043
Rebuttal Confidence 9/10
Defendant (LRP) · MEDIUM Risk
They will argue

Defence was filed and accepted by the court.

Rebuttal

Defence filed 27 days late (24 Oct 2024 vs 27 Sep 2024 deadline). No CPR 3.9 relief application. No Denton analysis. The Defence was filed 27 days late without CPR 3.9 relief. No Denton v TH White Ltd [2014] 1 WLR 3926 analysis was conducted. DDJ Wood's retrospective validation was void (MHCM Day 9). The court accepted the Defence without procedural scrutiny, while the Applicant's disability-related late filings were treated with maximum severity. Leadingway Consultants Ltd v Saab [2025] EWCA Civ 582 confirms promptness under CPR 13.3(2) carries heavy independent weight.

Authorities: AUTH-CASE-005; AUTH-CASE-007
Rebuttal Confidence 8/10
Defendant (Chelsea) · LOW Risk
They will argue

Chelsea was not aware of the claim or had difficulty responding.

Rebuttal

Chelsea Harbour Ltd was served and acknowledged service but filed no defence. 540+ days in default. No application for extension. No engagement whatsoever. N227 default judgment request filed but never determined. The suppression of a ministerial function for 540+ days is unprecedented.

Authorities: AUTH-CASE-004
Rebuttal Confidence 9/10

Evidence Chain (8 proof trails)

EC-001 OVERWHELMING (10/10)
6 lockouts without notice (Oct 2022 to May 2023)
Primary Evidence
LRP-DEF-001 (Defence para 10.5.2) ADMISSION CONCLUSIVE

Formal admission binding under CPR 14.1(5). Signed by Zulfikar Virani under Statement of Truth.

Corroborating Evidence (6)
  • CHE-KB-WS-006 (Steinhuber WS, 31 Jul 2024) INDEPENDENT_WITNESS STRONG
  • CHE-EVD-008 (WhatsApp, Silvia, 19 Dec 2023) CONTEMPORANEOUS STRONG
  • LRP-CC-POL-001 (Police report, Feb 2023) THIRD_PARTY_RECORD STRONG
  • CHE-FIN-002 (Staff resignations) CIRCUMSTANTIAL SUPPORTIVE
  • FACT-ADMISSION-002 (Defence para 10.7.3/10.11) ADMISSION CONCLUSIVE
  • F-LRP-LOCKOUT-1 through F-LRP-LOCKOUT-6 CHRONOLOGICAL_RECORD STRONG
Overall Strength: OVERWHELMING
EC-004 OVERWHELMING (10/10)
R1 Chelsea Harbour 540+ days in default
Primary Evidence
CE-File records: service date, no Defence filed COURT_RECORDS CONCLUSIVE

Binary fact. Defence either exists or does not. It does not.

Corroborating Evidence (4)
  • FACT-DEFAULT-003 (N227 filed 04.09.2024) APPLICATION_RECORD STRONG
  • CHE-DJ-001 (N227 Application) APPLICATION_RECORD STRONG
  • F-CASE-CHELSEA-DEFAULT ABSENCE_OF_EVIDENCE CONCLUSIVE
  • F-ROSS-BUNDLE (1,336-page misleading bundle) CIRCUMSTANTIAL SUPPORTIVE
Overall Strength: OVERWHELMING
EC-005 OVERWHELMING (10/10)
R2/R3 Defence 27 days late, no CPR 3.9 relief
Primary Evidence
Shoosmiths email timestamp 24.10.2024 12:41 COURT_RECORDS CONCLUSIVE

Timestamp is objective. Deadline was 27.09.2024. 27 days late.

Corroborating Evidence (5)
  • CPR 15.4 deadline calculation: 27.09.2024 CALCULATION CONCLUSIVE
  • No CPR 3.9 application on court file ABSENCE_OF_EVIDENCE CONCLUSIVE
  • LRP-ORD-001 (DDJ Wood order, 6 Jan 2025) DERIVATIVE_NULLITY STRONG
  • FACT-DEFAULT-004 (N227 filed 30.09.2024) APPLICATION_RECORD STRONG
  • F-CASE-LRP-LATE VERIFIED_FACT CONCLUSIVE
Overall Strength: OVERWHELMING
EC-011 OVERWHELMING (10/10)
Revenue collapsed 99.1% (GBP 624,568 to GBP 5,612)
Primary Evidence
CHE-FIN-003 (L04 Historical Revenue 2015-2022, 8 years verified) FINANCIAL_RECORDS CONCLUSIVE

Complete 8-year revenue history. Verified from accounting records.

Corroborating Evidence (9)
  • CHE-FIN-001 (Revenue Records 2014-2023) FINANCIAL_RECORDS CONCLUSIVE
  • F-REVENUE-2022 (Peak year GBP 624,568) VERIFIED_FACT CONCLUSIVE
  • F-REVENUE-2024 (GBP 5,612) VERIFIED_FACT CONCLUSIVE
  • F-CAGR (47.9% CAGR 2015-2022) ANALYSIS STRONG
  • F-ACCELERATION (+107% 2020-21, +77% 2021-22) ANALYSIS STRONG
  • CHE-KB-WS-006 (Steinhuber WS) INDEPENDENT_WITNESS STRONG
  • F-STAFF-RESIGNATIONS (5 staff resigned) WITNESS_EVIDENCE STRONG
  • LRP-CC-WS-002 (Revenue GBP 624,568 confirmed under oath) SWORN_EVIDENCE CONCLUSIVE
  • MDE-FIN-001 (Pitch Deck, Dec 2023) DOCUMENTARY STRONG
Overall Strength: OVERWHELMING
EC-024 STRONG (8/10)
Causes of action assigned pre-winding-up (21 Aug 2024)
Primary Evidence
Sealed Amended Particulars of Claim (21 Aug 2024) COURT_RECORDS CONCLUSIVE

Assignment was 35 days BEFORE winding-up order (25 Sep 2024). BL-2025-000147 is personal claim.

Corroborating Evidence (3)
  • LRP-CLM-001 (BL-2025-000147 Part 7 Claim, GBP 1.95M) COURT_RECORDS STRONG
  • F-CLAIM-ISSUED (BL-2024-001166 issued 12 Aug 2024) CHRONOLOGY CONCLUSIVE
  • HMRC-ORD-004 (Winding-up order, 25 Sep 2024) CHRONOLOGY CONCLUSIVE
Overall Strength: STRONG
EC-025 STRONG (8/10)
DCF valuation GBP 11.82M midpoint
Primary Evidence
MDE-FIN-002 (DCF Schedules: WACC 12%, EBITDA 30%, NPV GBP 11.82M) FINANCIAL_ANALYSIS STRONG

Three scenarios: conservative GBP 3.3M, moderate GBP 4.7M, historic GBP 17.1M. Midpoint GBP 11.82M.

Corroborating Evidence (8)
  • CHE-FIN-003 (8-year verified revenue) FOUNDATION CONCLUSIVE
  • MDE-FIN-005 (Five-Year Forecast) PROJECTION MODERATE
  • CHE-KB-WS-006 (Steinhuber: GBP 600K retracted) INDEPENDENT_VALIDATION STRONG
  • MDE-FIN-001 (Pitch Deck, 1,446% growth) DOCUMENTARY STRONG
  • F-QUANTUM-LRP (GBP 4,907,000 pleaded) PLEADED_AMOUNT STRONG
  • F-QUANTUM-PERSONAL (GBP 3,325,000) PLEADED_AMOUNT STRONG
  • F-QUANTUM-COMBINED (GBP 20M+) TOTAL STRONG
  • F-CRYSTALLISED (GBP 1,185,165 crystallised) VERIFIED_LOSS CONCLUSIVE
Overall Strength: STRONG
EC-028 OVERWHELMING (9/10)
R1 Chelsea Harbour also in default in BL-2025-000147 (150+ days)
Primary Evidence
BL-2025-000147 court file COURT_RECORDS CONCLUSIVE

Claim issued 3 Feb 2025, served 8 May 2025, defence deadline 4 Jun 2025. MISSED.

Corroborating Evidence (4)
  • F-CASE-BL2025-DEFAULT VERIFIED_FACT CONCLUSIVE
  • EC-004 (Chelsea default in BL-2024-001089, 540+ days) PATTERN STRONG
  • LRP-CLM-001 (BL-2025-000147 Claim Form) DOCUMENTARY STRONG
  • JR-ORD-010 (Master Kaye pre-service stay, MHCM Day 61) VOID_ORDER STRONG
Overall Strength: OVERWHELMING
EC-029 OVERWHELMING (10/10)
Two lockouts AFTER written harassment warning (17 Feb 2023)
Primary Evidence
FACT-ADMISSION-002 (Defence para 10.7.3/10.11) ADMISSION CONCLUSIVE

Defence admits Michael warned of police/harassment complaint on 17 Feb 2023 AND admits two further lockouts on 27 Apr and 20 May 2023.

Corroborating Evidence (4)
  • LRP-CC-POL-001 (Police report correspondence) THIRD_PARTY_RECORD STRONG
  • F-LRP-LOCKOUT-5 (27 Apr 2023) VERIFIED_FACT CONCLUSIVE
  • F-LRP-LOCKOUT-6 (20 May 2023) VERIFIED_FACT CONCLUSIVE
  • PHA 1997 s.1(1) LEGAL_AUTHORITY STRONG
Overall Strength: OVERWHELMING

Ground Dependencies

If This Ground Succeeds
  • AR-6
  • AR-7
  • Default judgment entered in BL-2024-001089 (Chelsea, 540+ days) and BL-2024-001166 (LRP, Defence 27 days late). Quantum assessed. GBP 20M+ claims proceed to assessment.
If This Ground Fails
  • G-A10
  • G-A11
  • Court exercises discretion to refuse. Fallback: substantive trial on the merits.

Fallback: Defence admits liability (para 10.5.2, 17.4). Even at trial, admissions are binding under CPR 14. Cohen SJ attacked independently.

Independence: Partially dependent on other grounds succeeding.

Where This Appears

Case Assignment

ChelseaPersonalLRP/Vista

Linked Facts (5)

FACT-DEFAULT-002 FACT-004 FACT-ADMISSION-001 FACT-DEFAULT-001 FACT-DEFAULT-003

Linked Exhibits (1)

MDE-EVD-001

Linked Authorities (5)

Civil Procedure Rules r.12.3 Messih v McMillan Williams [2010] EWCA Civ 844 Billington v Davies [2017] EWHC 3009 (Ch) Civil Procedure Rules r.3.9 Civil Procedure Rules r.15.4
Admin Notice Parts: IV · Relief: D · Legacy IDs: G3, G10, G-04 · All Grounds · Relief Sought · Argument Map

© 2026 Michael Darius Eastwood. Published under the open justice principle.

Legal Disclaimer · All Cases

Evidence
Open in full page