KB-2024-001508
Source of the costs order used to justify the stay in BL-2024-001089.
Proves trajectory of growth destroyed by defendant conduct.
Proves IP value for conversion and Wrotham Park damages.
Proves investment destroyed by Chelsea Harbour conduct.
Proves company value and growth destroyed by lockouts. Supports quantum.
Quantum basis for damages claim. Wrotham Park damages methodology.
Supports NPV calculation and future loss claim.
Demonstrates pattern of institutional failures across proceedings.
Establishes protected characteristic (Equality Act 2010 s.6) and entitlement to
Proves transcript obstruction. Only 1 of at least 5 formal EX107 applications resulted in any tr
Contains para 50 ('remains open to bring substantive claim') which contradicts S
Documents the loops. Michael amended form twice in one day. Chased multiple time
First transcript refusal. Denied Michael evidence of procedural unfairness. Set
Foundational proof for statutory nullity (Reg 7(12) DSRR 2020) of all orders dur
Cross-cutting evidence supporting multiple claims.
Cross-cutting evidence supporting multiple claims.
Outstanding SAR. No response received. Evidence of institutional obstruction.
Outstanding SAR. No response received. 346+ days overdue. Records may contradict
Confirms protected characteristic (EA 2010 s.6) and ongoing crisis during MHCM p
Outstanding SAR. No response. 34+ days overdue. Case manager redirected to gener