All documented with timestamps. Multiple addresses. No substantive reply.
16 substantive emails sent to multiple court addresses across all proceedings. Not a single substantive response. Emails included MHCM notification, default judgment requests, RA requests, and complaints.
What the opponent will argue, and why they are wrong.
Emails were received and processed through normal channels.
No substantive response to ANY of the 16 emails. SAR filed 20.02.2025, now 395+ days overdue. If emails were processed, SAR would show this. Silence is the evidence. Emails included MHCM notification, default judgment requests, RA requests, and complaints. All sent to multiple court addresses.
Courts are not obliged to respond to every email. The volume of correspondence was itself the problem.
These were not frivolous emails. They included statutory MHCM notifications (mandatory to acknowledge), default judgment requests (ministerial function), and RA requests (legal obligation to assess). Even one unanswered MHCM notification is a failure. 16 substantive emails with zero responses across multiple courts = systemic failure.
SAR sent. No response. 395+ days exceeds statutory 30-day limit by 365+ days.
Scheduled with dates, recipients, subjects. Sent to multiple court email addresses.
Fallback: 16 ignored emails is pattern evidence feeding into G-A13 cumulative unfairness regardless of standalone result.
Independence: Partially dependent on other grounds succeeding.