M. D. Eastwood
/
Overview & Briefing
4
Judicial Briefing
Guide for Court
How the Cases Connect
The Story
Orders Sought
4
Relief Sought
33
Quantum (£8.2M+ pleaded)
Why One Judge Must Hear All
Settlement Exposure
The Costs Trap
Void Ab Initio
29:0
29 Adverse : 0 Favourable
1 in 537M
21 Void Orders (All Void)
MHCM Calendar
Defence Admissions
Defence Contradictions
Equality of Arms
Filing Pattern (0/12 RA)
Staff Impact (6 Resignations)
Gaslighting
13
No Time Bar Applies
9 Grounds
Grounds of Voidness
23
CA-2024-001353 · s.31A SCA 1981
Appeal Overview
23 Grounds of Voidness
Argument Map
KB Hearing (7 June)
Waiver/Estoppel
Judicial Review
12
7 bodies · 34 ECHR · permission sought
JR Targets
7
ECHR Violations
34
Institutional Failures
Solicitor Misconduct
Transcript Obstruction
0/12 Adjustments Granted
Subject Access Requests
SAR Tracker
3 overdue
Pre-Action Letters
Constitutional
DWP Judicial Review
Wheelchair Ramp
The 6 Cases
6
Chelsea Harbour Ltd (R1)
Lower Richmond Properties Ltd & Vista (London) Ltd (R2, R3)
Personal Damages
Insolvency
KB Injunction
Defendants
Evidence & Documents
11
103 exhibits · 160 authorities · 1395 events
Evidence Hub
Exhibits
103
Gallery
Chronology
1395
Authorities
160
Key Quotes
Revenue & DCF
Costs Analysis
OR Response + 15 Enclosures
Applications
All Documents
Reference & Tools
14
Ask the Case
Search
/
Master Timeline
Order Timeline
CPR Heatmap
CPR Dictionary
Citation Index
Glossary
Evidence Trails
Document Timeline
Evidence Matrix
Evidence Audit
Argument Index
Data Health
Open Justice
Assurance and Governance
Health Report
🌱
Built with Eden Legal AI
✓
visited ·
?
shortcuts
clear
Order ORD-2025-02-20
BL-2024-001089
https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/legal
Legal
/
Orders
/
20 February 2025
ORD-2025-02-20
Ex Parte Stay Dismissal
VOID
VOID AB INITIO
MHCM Day 54
Date
20 February 2025
Judge
Master Kaye
Case
BL-2024-001089
Type
Ex Parte Stay Dismissal
Classification
VOID AB INITIO
MHCM Day
Day 54
(within moratorium period)
Defects Identified
MHCM Violation
Ex Parte Without Notice
Notes
Dismissed stay application without hearing during MHCM.
Where This Appears
Case
Chelsea
BL-2024-001089
Grounds Challenging This Order (1)
G-A1