M. D. Eastwood
/
Overview & Briefing 4
Judicial Briefing Guide for Court How the Cases Connect The Story
Orders Sought 4
Relief Sought 33 Quantum (£8.2M+ pleaded) Why One Judge Must Hear All Settlement Exposure The Costs Trap
Void Ab Initio 29:0
29 Adverse : 0 Favourable 1 in 537M 21 Void Orders (All Void) MHCM Calendar Defence Admissions Defence Contradictions Equality of Arms Filing Pattern (0/12 RA) Staff Impact (6 Resignations) Gaslighting 13
No Time Bar Applies 9 Grounds
Grounds of Voidness 23
CA-2024-001353 · s.31A SCA 1981
Appeal Overview 23 Grounds of Voidness Argument Map KB Hearing (7 June) Waiver/Estoppel
Judicial Review 12
7 bodies · 34 ECHR · permission sought
JR Targets 7 ECHR Violations 34 Institutional Failures Solicitor Misconduct Transcript Obstruction 0/12 Adjustments Granted Subject Access Requests SAR Tracker 3 overdue Pre-Action Letters Constitutional DWP Judicial Review Wheelchair Ramp
The 6 Cases 6
Chelsea Harbour Ltd (R1) Lower Richmond Properties Ltd & Vista (London) Ltd (R2, R3) Personal Damages Insolvency KB Injunction Defendants
Evidence & Documents 11
103 exhibits · 160 authorities · 1395 events
Evidence Hub Exhibits 103 Gallery Chronology 1395 Authorities 160 Key Quotes Revenue & DCF Costs Analysis OR Response + 15 Enclosures Applications All Documents
Reference & Tools 14
Ask the Case Search / Master Timeline Order Timeline CPR Heatmap CPR Dictionary Citation Index Glossary Evidence Trails Document Timeline Evidence Matrix Evidence Audit Argument Index Data Health Open Justice Assurance and Governance Health Report
🌱 Built with Eden Legal AI
✓ visited · ? shortcuts clear
Legal/Filing Timeline

Filing Timeline

A complete chronological record of claims, defences, applications, and court orders across all proceedings. Late filings and defaults are highlighted in red. Void orders are marked. The MHCM moratorium period (28 December 2024 to 16 April 2025) is indicated on the timeline. Every order made during the moratorium is void ab initio under Regulation 7(12) DSRR 2020.

Governed filing overlay. Administrative Notice status from the filing-status register: NOT_FILED. THIS IS THE ONLY ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE BEING FILED. No prior version has been filed. Ready to file 27/03/2026. NO PRIOR ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE HAS EVER BEEN FILED WITH ANY COURT. All prior versions are working drafts only. The only Administrative Notice being filed is document 02 in this pack, on 27/03/2026. Publication order and page chronology do not, by themselves, prove filing or sending.
6 Active Cases
21 Void Orders
NaN+ Days in Default
0 Claimant Applications
0 Dismissed / Ignored
0/0 Defendant Apps / Granted
Claim/Service
Defence Due/Filed
Claimant Application
Defendant Application
Court Order
Key Event
VOID Void Order
DEFAULT No Defence Filed
🔨 Court Order KB-2024-001615
7 June 2024
Counter-Injunction
Judge: HHJ Kelly. Classification: PROCEDURAL UNFAIRNESS. Costs: Reserved pending Part 8 application (no hearing requested since 7 June 2024).
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001089
23 July 2024
N244
Relief sought: . Outcome: PART_GRANTED. Early application to protect medical records disclosure.
⚖️ Claim Filed BL-2024-001089
29 July 2024
N5A Relief from Forfeiture filed
High Court (Chancery Division). Quantum: Damages to be assessed by the court.
✉️ Service Effected BL-2024-001089
1 August 2024
Claim BL-2024-001089 served on Defendant
📝 Defendant Application KB-2024-001508
7 August 2024
EX107
Relief sought: . Outcome: REFUSED. Two months of loops. Kelly approved judgment-only at public expense on 02.09.2024. Judgment transcript revised by judge before release. The irony: even the partial transcript exposed Ross's lies.
DISMISSED
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001089
7 August 2024
N244
Relief sought: . Outcome: GRANTED. The only defendant application that was properly sealed and served. Granted despite R1 being in default (never filed Defence). DM Glover directions order contained unpronounced terms (CPR 40.12 breach).
GRANTED
⚖️ Claim Filed BL-2024-001166
12 August 2024
Part 7 Damages (Harassment / Conversion) filed
County Court at Central London. High Court. Quantum: £4,907,000 (subject to court assessment).
➡️ Transfer BL-2024-001166
13 August 2024
Case transferred: Pre-service Void
VOID
🔨 Court Order BL-2024-001166
13 August 2024
First Transfer Order
Judge: Master Clark. Classification: JURISDICTIONAL VOID.
VOID
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001166
16 August 2024
N244
Relief sought: . Outcome: DELETED_FROM_CE_FILE. THE PROCEDURAL TRAP. Set-aside application filed 16 August 2024, 3 days after void transfer. Court staff deleted it from CE-File. Created Kafkaesque loop: cannot challenge in High Court (application deleted), cannot challenge in County Court (no jurisdiction). BL-2024-001166 remains the only valid case number.
⏰ Defence Due BL-2024-001089
18 August 2024
Defence due from Chelsea Harbour Ltd (R1)
No defence filed. 540++ days in default.
DEFAULT
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001089
25 August 2024
N244
Relief sought: . Outcome: DISMISSED. Determination made during MHCM period. Void ab initio.
DISMISSED
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001089
29 August 2024
N244
Relief sought: . Outcome: DISMISSED_TWM. Costs deferral is one of the TWM items. Application made BEFORE MHCM but determined DURING MHCM. TWM certification is void.
TWM
✉️ Service Effected BL-2024-001166
30 August 2024
Claim BL-2024-001166 served on Defendant
🔨 Court Order BL-2024-001166
3 September 2024
Second Transfer Order
Judge: Deputy Master Dovar. Classification: DERIVATIVE NULLITY.
VOID
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001089
4 September 2024
N227
Relief sought: . Outcome: IGNORED. R1 has NEVER filed a Defence. CPR 12.3 mandates entry as ministerial function of court officer. 10+ follow-up emails ignored.
IGNORED
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001089
4 September 2024
N244
Relief sought: . Outcome: STAYED. Valid CPR 12.3 default judgment application AND alternative Part 24 summary judgment application. NEVER LISTED for substantive hearing. Violates access to justice principles.
STAYED
🔨 Court Order BL-2024-001166
4 September 2024
Sealing of Claim Form (Post-Transfer)
Judge: Unknown (Sealing Officer). Classification: DERIVATIVE NULLITY.
VOID
🔨 Court Order CR-2024-000527
25 September 2024
Winding-Up Order
Judge: ICC Judge Greenwood. Classification: VOID (Natural Justice + EA 2010 + Jurisdiction).
VOID
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001166
26 September 2024
APPLICATION_UNSEALED
Relief sought: . Outcome: GRANTED_IMPLICITLY. No N244 filed. No sealed application. No Certificate of Service. Court adopted defendants' request without process. CPR 23.1 violation. Defence filed 27 days after deadline knowing: (1) no sealed extension order; (2) N227 default judgment application pending. Defence is invalid without CPR 3.9 relief (Billington v Davies).
GRANTED
⏰ Defence Due BL-2024-001166
27 September 2024
Defence due from Lower Richmond Properties Ltd (R2)
Filed: 24.10.2024 (27 days late).
📝 Defendant Application H51YX140/BL-2024-001166
30 September 2024
N227
Relief sought: . Outcome: IGNORED. Filed under H51YX140 (the High Court temporary reference) alongside BL-2024-001166. Court claimed it could not process because case was in County Court. But transfer was jurisdictionally void.
IGNORED
📝 Defendant Application H51YX140
30 September 2024
N227
Relief sought: . Outcome: IGNORED. Filed as a safety measure alongside APP-C-002 in case temporary reference was needed. Neither was processed.
IGNORED
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001166
30 September 2024
N227
Relief sought: . Outcome: IGNORED. Proper and timely default judgment application made 3 days after defence deadline expired. Ignored for 540+ days despite 10+ follow-ups.
IGNORED
🔨 Court Order BL-2024-001089
1 October 2024
Directions Order
Judge: Deputy Master Glover. Classification: VOID.
VOID
⚖️ Claim Filed CA-2024-001353
4 October 2024
Appeal (Refusal of Interim Injunction) filed
Court of Appeal (Civil Division). Quantum: Unquantified.
📄 Defence Filed BL-2024-001166
24 October 2024
Defence filed (27 days late)
Filed 27 days after the CPR deadline. No CPR 3.9 relief application was made. Defence is a procedural nullity (Billington).
LATE
🔨 Court Order CR-2024-000527
4 December 2024
Rescission Refusal
Judge: ICC Judge Prentis. Classification: DERIVATIVE NULLITY.
VOID
MHCM Moratorium Begins. 28 December 2024
🔨 Court Order BL-2024-001166
6 January 2025
Unless Order / Costs Order
Judge: DDJ Wood. Classification: VOID AB INITIO. Costs: £22,528 Forthwith (Void). MHCM Day 9.
VOID Day 9
⚖️ Claim Filed BL-2025-000147
3 February 2025
Part 7 Personal Damages filed
High Court (Chancery Division). Quantum: £3,325,000 (provisional, subject to court assessment).
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001089
3 February 2025
N244
Relief sought: . Outcome: DISMISSED_PARTS_TWM. The Wasif/Grace issue: 11 limbs included consolidation, transcripts, s.130(2) leave, reasonable adjustments, and other administrative housekeeping. A global TWM on the whole application violates Wasif v SRA [2023] EWCA Civ 1155 and Grace v Black Horse Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 1413 which require each limb to be assessed individually.
TWM
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001089
3 February 2025
N244
Relief sought: . Outcome: REFUSED_TWM. Part of the 11-limb omnibus application (APP-C-009) but decided separately on paper. The equitable assignment point alone makes this arguable, not TWM. Determined during MHCM, so void regardless.
DISMISSED
🔨 Court Order BL-2024-001089
5 February 2025
s.130(2) Leave Refusal
Judge: Master Kaye. Classification: VOID AB INITIO. MHCM Day 39.
VOID Day 39
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001089
6 February 2025
ORAL_APPLICATION
Relief sought: . Outcome: GRANTED. No N244. No written application. No service. No CPR 3.3(5)(b) notification. No CPR 3.11 warning before CRO. Made during MHCM (void). Made 7 days after complaint (bias). Made ex parte without opportunity to respond (Potanina). Nuclear option without proportionality analysis (Bhamjee). FOUR independent grounds of invalidity.
GRANTED
🔨 Court Order BL-2024-001089
6 February 2025
Master's Ruling (Interim Payment)
Judge: Master Kaye. Classification: VOID AB INITIO. Costs: Linked to £12k payment. MHCM Day 40.
VOID Day 40
🔨 Court Order BL-2024-001089
6 February 2025
Stay & Strike Out Order
Judge: Master Kaye. Classification: VOID AB INITIO. MHCM Day 40.
VOID Day 40
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001089
20 February 2025
N244
Relief sought: . Outcome: DISMISSED_TWM. Filed to seek formal acknowledgment of MHCM statutory stay. Dismissed by Master Kaye 7 days after formal complaint. Porter v Magill bias nexus.
TWM
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001089
20 February 2025
FORMAL_COMPLAINT
Relief sought: . Outcome: PARTIALLY_ACKNOWLEDGED. Three requests combined: (1) Formal complaint about Master Kaye documenting disability discrimination; (2) Subject Access Request (SAR); (3) Reasonable adjustment request for ALL hearing transcripts. Complaint weaponised: LCRO imposed 7 days later.
📝 Defendant Application ALL
20 February 2025
SAR
Relief sought: . Outcome: IGNORED. SAR covers all personal data held by HMCTS including internal communications about Michael's cases, the judge swap from Dight to Cohen, and pre-existing relationships between Cohen and defendants' counsel. 395+ days in breach of UK GDPR.
IGNORED
🔨 Court Order BL-2024-001089
20 February 2025
Ex Parte Stay Dismissal
Judge: Master Kaye. Classification: VOID AB INITIO. MHCM Day 54.
VOID Day 54
🔨 Court Order BL-2024-001089
27 February 2025
Costs Order
Judge: Master Kaye. Classification: VOID AB INITIO. Costs: £12,000 Interim Payment. MHCM Day 61.
VOID Day 61
🔨 Court Order BL-2024-001089
27 February 2025
Limited Civil Restraint Order
Judge: Master Kaye. Classification: VOID AB INITIO. MHCM Day 61.
VOID Day 61
🔨 Court Order BL-2024-001089
27 February 2025
N460 Permission Refusal
Judge: Master Kaye. Classification: VOID AB INITIO. MHCM Day 61.
VOID Day 61
🔨 Court Order BL-2024-001089
27 February 2025
Stay of Enforcement Order
Judge: Master Kaye. Classification: VOID AB INITIO. MHCM Day 61.
VOID Day 61
🔨 Court Order BL-2025-000147
27 February 2025
Pre-service Stay Order
Judge: Master Kaye. Classification: VOID AB INITIO. MHCM Day 61.
VOID Day 61
MHCM Moratorium Ends. 16 April 2025
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001166
22 May 2025
APPLICATION_UNSEALED
Relief sought: . Outcome: GRANTED. Summary judgment granted on unserved, unsealed application. Cohen adopted counsel's draft order, refused all LiP corrections. The fruit of the poisonous tree: founded on void DDJ Wood order which validated a late Defence. Defence itself contains sworn admissions conceding liability.
GRANTED
📝 Defendant Application CR-2024-000527
26 June 2025
EX107
Relief sought: . Outcome: IGNORED. Winding-up hearing. Would prove order made without evidence and after JR mention (victimisation). Rolls Building total silence.
IGNORED
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001089
26 June 2025
EX107
Relief sought: . Outcome: IGNORED. Would prove unpronounced terms inserted into sealed order (CPR 40.12 fabrication). Rolls Building total silence.
IGNORED
📝 Defendant Application CR-2024-000527
26 June 2025
EX107
Relief sought: . Outcome: IGNORED. Rescission hearing. Judge interrupted evidence. Bounce Back Loan raised prejudicially. Rolls Building total silence.
IGNORED
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001089
26 June 2025
EX107
Relief sought: . Outcome: IGNORED. s.130(2) TWM certification on MHCM Day 39/40. Would prove 12,000 costs enforcement during moratorium. Also requested in 20 Feb 2025 complaint as reasonable adjustment. Rolls Building total silence.
IGNORED
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001089
26 June 2025
EX107
Relief sought: . Outcome: IGNORED. LCRO imposed 7 days after complaint. The most critical Rolls Building transcript. Would prove complaint weaponisation. Rolls Building total silence.
IGNORED
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001089
26 June 2025
EX107
Relief sought: . Outcome: IGNORED. Bundle ban and other terms not pronounced. Sixth Rolls Building request, sixth silence.
IGNORED
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001166
18 August 2025
N244
Relief sought: . Outcome: DISMISSED. Sought to set aside void DDJ Wood order (Reg 7(12)), enter default judgment (27 days late defence (procedural nullity)), and transfer to High Court (claim exceeds £15M). Cohen dismissed without engaging with MHCM argument or defence admissions.
DISMISSED
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001166
2025
EX107
Relief sought: . Outcome: OBSTRUCTED. THE MOST CRITICAL COUNTY COURT TRANSCRIPT. Would prove: (a) costs 'reserved' not 'forthwith 22,528' (CPR 40.12 fabrication); (b) MHCM notified ORALLY at hearing; (c) RA requested and refused. 'Mr Darius' is exhibit evidence of obstruction.
📝 Defendant Application BL-2024-001166
2025
EX107
Relief sought: . Outcome: OBSTRUCTED. Would prove: 'Had you had counsel maybe you would have won'; CPR 3.10 refused 'notwithstanding vulnerability'; summary judgment on APPLICATION NEVER SERVED on Applicant.
📝 Defendant Application CR-2024-000527
2024
APPLICATION
Relief sought: . Outcome: REFUSED. Sought to rescind winding-up order on grounds including EA 2010, pending High Court claims (9.2M+), and MHCM. Refused without proper EA 2010 consideration.
DISMISSED
MHCM Moratorium Begins. 28 December 2024
MHCM Moratorium Ends. 16 April 2025
🔨 Court Order CR-2024-000527
23 July 2025
PE Transfer Order
Judge: Chief ICC Judge Briggs. Classification: JURISDICTIONAL VOID.
VOID
📝 Defendant Application BL-2025-000147
24 July 2025
N227
Relief sought: . Outcome: IGNORED. Personal claim (not company). Pre-winding-up assignment of causes of action (21 Aug 2024). Stay is void (MHCM Day 61). Default judgment should be entered under CPR 12.3.
IGNORED
🔨 Court Order CR-2024-000527
7 August 2025
Public Examination Order
Judge: DJ Hart. Classification: DERIVATIVE NULLITY.
VOID
🔨 Court Order BL-2024-001166
19 August 2025
Summary Judgment Order
Judge: Recorder Cohen KC. Classification: DERIVATIVE NULLITY. Costs: Dismissed with Costs.
VOID
🔨 Court Order BL-2024-001166
19 August 2025
N460 Permission Refusal / TWM on PTA
Judge: Recorder Cohen KC. Classification: DERIVATIVE NULLITY.
VOID
🔨 Court Order CR-2024-000527
19 November 2025
Arrest Warrant
Judge: DJ Mauger. Classification: VOID AB INITIO.
VOID

Filing Record Summary

The Claimant logged 0 applications in the case record. None were granted outright. 0 were ignored. 0 were dismissed or refused. The Defendants filed 0 applications; 0 were granted. 21 court orders are void ab initio, of which 10 were made during the MHCM moratorium. The maximum period of default without defence is NaN+ days. The 29:0 discretionary pattern favouring Respondents has a probability under neutrality of less than 1 in 536,870,912.

Michael Darius Eastwood

Litigant in Person | ADHD + ASD (EA 2010 s.6) | RA Ref: 67862925

© 2026 Michael Darius Eastwood. Published under the open justice principle.