M. D. Eastwood
/
Overview & Briefing 4
Judicial Briefing Guide for Court How the Cases Connect The Story
Orders Sought 4
Relief Sought 33 Quantum (£8.2M+ pleaded) Why One Judge Must Hear All Settlement Exposure The Costs Trap
Void Ab Initio 29:0
29 Adverse : 0 Favourable 1 in 537M 21 Void Orders (All Void) MHCM Calendar Defence Admissions Defence Contradictions Equality of Arms Filing Pattern (0/12 RA) Staff Impact (6 Resignations) Gaslighting 13
No Time Bar Applies 9 Grounds
Grounds of Voidness 23
CA-2024-001353 · s.31A SCA 1981
Appeal Overview 23 Grounds of Voidness Argument Map KB Hearing (7 June) Waiver/Estoppel
Judicial Review 12
7 bodies · 34 ECHR · permission sought
JR Targets 7 ECHR Violations 34 Institutional Failures Solicitor Misconduct Transcript Obstruction 0/12 Adjustments Granted Subject Access Requests SAR Tracker 3 overdue Pre-Action Letters Constitutional DWP Judicial Review Wheelchair Ramp
The 6 Cases 6
Chelsea Harbour Ltd (R1) Lower Richmond Properties Ltd & Vista (London) Ltd (R2, R3) Personal Damages Insolvency KB Injunction Defendants

Evidence & Documents 11
103 exhibits · 160 authorities · 1395 events
Evidence Hub Exhibits 103 Gallery Chronology 1395 Authorities 160 Key Quotes Revenue & DCF Costs Analysis OR Response + 15 Enclosures Applications All Documents
Reference & Tools 14
Ask the Case Search / Master Timeline Order Timeline CPR Heatmap CPR Dictionary Citation Index Glossary Evidence Trails Document Timeline Evidence Matrix Evidence Audit Argument Index Data Health Open Justice Assurance and Governance Health Report
🌱 Built with Eden Legal AI
✓ visited · ? shortcuts clear
Order ORD-2024-06-07-COUNTER-INJUNCTION
KB-2024-001615
https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/legal
Legal/Orders/7 June 2024

ORD-2024-06-07-COUNTER-INJUNCTION

Counter-Injunction

CHALLENGED PROCEDURAL UNFAIRNESS
Date
7 June 2024
Judge
HHJ Kelly
Case
KB-2024-001615
Type
Counter-Injunction
Classification
PROCEDURAL UNFAIRNESS
Costs Order
Reserved pending Part 8 application (no hearing requested since 7 June 2024)
Defects Identified
  • Application served less than 2 days before hearing
  • No reasonable adjustments made (EA 2010 s.20)
  • Over-restrictive: prevents access to public area near home
  • Equality Act 2010 breach
Notes

Chelsea Harbour Limited's counter-injunction preventing the Applicant from accessing a public area near his home. Same hearing as KB-2024-001508 interim injunction. Appeal filed to Court of Appeal but never sealed and no case number assigned. Applicant seeks to set aside on grounds of procedural unfairness, failure to make reasonable adjustments, and Equality Act 2010 breach.

Where This Appears

Case

KB-2024-001615 KB-2024-001615

© 2026 Michael Darius Eastwood. Published under the open justice principle.

Legal Disclaimer · All Cases

Evidence
Open in full page