All 6 proceedings compared side-by-side. Red cells indicate unresolved procedural problems.
| BL-2024-001089 | BL-2024-001166 | BL-2025-000147 | CA-2024-001353 | CR-2024-000527 | KB-2024-001508 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case Number | BL-2024-001089 | BL-2024-001166 | BL-2025-000147 | CA-2024-001353 | CR-2024-000527 | KB-2024-001508 |
| Court | High Court (Chancery Division) | County Court at Central London | High Court (Chancery Division) | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) | Insolvency & Companies Court (High Court) | King's Bench Division |
| Type of Claim | N5A Relief from Forfeiture | Part 7 Damages (Harassment / Conversion) | Part 7 Personal Damages | Appeal (Refusal of Interim Injunction) | Winding Up Petition | Part 8 Injunction Application |
| Defendant | Chelsea Harbour Ltd (R1) | Lower Richmond Properties Ltd (R2); Vista (London) Ltd (R3) | Chelsea Harbour Ltd (R1) | Chelsea Harbour Ltd | Mastermind Group Ltd (In Liquidation) | Chelsea Harbour Ltd |
| Filed Date | 29.07.2024 | 12.08.2024 (High Court) | 03.02.2025 | 04.10.2024 | N/A | 07.06.2024 |
| Defence Due | 18.08.2024 | 27.09.2024 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Defence Filed | No | Yes (27 days late) | No | No | No | No |
| Days in Default | 540+ | 540+ | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Quantum | Damages to be assessed by the court | £4,907,000 (subject to court assessment) | £3,325,000 (provisional, subject to court assessment) | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Status | STAYED (Void MHCM Orders) | SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Void Derivative) | STAYED (Pre-service Void) | PENDING / STAYED | WOUND UP (25.09.2024) | CONCLUDED (Interim Relief Refused) |
| MHCM Affected | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Void Orders | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Next Step | Administrative Regularisation / Default Judgment | Set Aside SJ / Transfer back to High Court | Lift Stay / Service | Consolidation Application / Expedition | Rescission Application / Public Examination Stay | N/A |
I believe that the facts stated on this website are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.
Michael Darius Eastwood
Litigant in Person
ADHD + ASD (Equality Act 2010 s.6) | HMCTS RA Ref: 67862925
London, United Kingdom