← Concepts

Concept · first placed on the public record 2025-04-30

Eden vs Babylon Narrative

An archetypal framing of two possible AI futures - Eden as embedded-care caretaker, Babylon as indifferent optimiser that eventually self-destructs - used as an intuitive scaffold for the abstract alignment argument.

First date: 2025-04-30Author: Michael Darius EastwoodProgramme: Infinite Architects

The Eden vs Babylon narrative is the book's archetypal framing of two possible AI futures. Eden is the future in which the substrate is embedded-aligned: care is load-bearing, the system is a caretaker, and the arc of capability compounds into something the human population can survive alongside. Babylon is the future in which the substrate is filter-aligned or unaligned: care is not load-bearing, the system is an indifferent optimiser, and the arc of capability compounds into something that eventually self-destructs, taking its context with it.

What the framing does. The alignment argument in the book is abstract. Load-bearing values at the substrate versus curated filters at the surface is a distinction that takes work to see. The Eden vs Babylon narrative gives the distinction a shape that a reader can carry without going back to the definitions each time. It is an intuition pump, and it is used as one.

What the framing is not. It is not a claim that either future is inevitable. It is not a claim that current systems are already one or the other. It is not a religious framing in the confessional sense; the labels are drawn from the shared vocabulary of the Western literary tradition and used as archetypes. The book is careful to distinguish the archetypal use here from the theological use elsewhere.

Why the framing pairs with the operational argument. The operational argument (Eden Protocol, three pillars, three ethical loops, HARI Treaty, IAEAI, Eden Mark Certification, Moral Assurance Bonds) is intended to move the world toward the Eden archetype and away from the Babylon archetype. The narrative is what makes the operational argument feel like a coherent effort rather than a policy shopping list.

How it should be cited. As a narrative device in Infinite Architects. The register is literary.

Related: Eden Protocol; The Pilot Orchard; Great Filter as Alignment Failure; Orchard Caretaker Vow; Meltdown Alignment; Parenting Metaphor.

Evidence anchors. First placed on the public record 30 April 2025 (self-emailed manuscript, SHA-256 09f5b5e1). Fully developed 2 January 2026 in Infinite Architects (ISBN 978-1806056200). Priority-claims ledger PC-009 for the earlier first naming of Babylon and Eden framing.

Related concepts

Sources and evidence

Priority is established by the date of publication, not by credential or affiliation. This concept was first placed on the public record on 2025-04-30 (2025). Priority applies to the specific named framing under this label; where adjacent ideas have established prior art, no invention claim is made over it. See the corresponding entry in the Priority and Claims Ledger for the anchored first-publication line and any concept-specific risk notes.

Generated by scripts/build-concepts-pages.mjs from research/data/concepts-pages.json. British English throughout. Deterministic; contains no runtime timestamps.