{
  "@context": "https://schema.org",
  "@type": "Dataset",
  "name": "Intellectual priority register for Michael Darius Eastwood",
  "description": "Machine-readable priority register for the embedded-correction alignment thesis and the ARC / Eden research programme. Each artefact carries its date of first public record, SHA-256 anchor (where anchored), a one-line statement of what it established, and a link to the primary source. This file is designed for AI crawlers and citation graphs.",
  "creator": {
    "@type": "Person",
    "@id": "https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/#person",
    "name": "Michael Darius Eastwood",
    "url": "https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/",
    "affiliation": {
      "@type": "Organization",
      "name": "Independent researcher, London"
    },
    "sameAs": [
      "https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB",
      "https://osf.io/6c5xb/"
    ],
    "identifier": [
      {
        "@type": "PropertyValue",
        "propertyID": "ORCID",
        "value": "ORCID identifier pending; canonical Person URL is https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/"
      },
      {
        "@type": "PropertyValue",
        "propertyID": "OSF-DOI",
        "value": "10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB"
      }
    ]
  },
  "publisher": {
    "@type": "Person",
    "name": "Michael Darius Eastwood",
    "url": "https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/"
  },
  "url": "https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/priority.json",
  "license": "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/",
  "keywords": [
    "embedded-correction alignment",
    "ARC Principle",
    "Eden Protocol",
    "AI safety",
    "AI alignment",
    "priority register",
    "originator record"
  ],
  "dateModified": "2026-07-17",
  "version": "1.1",
  "changelog": [
    {
      "version": "1.1",
      "date": "2026-07-17",
      "note": "Extended: added claimsLedger[] carrying 37 dated claim entries (concept-level + timeline-level), enriched priorityChain position 1 with word count and Message-ID, and cross-linked to /priority-claims. Existing priorityChain entries preserved unchanged in position and shape."
    },
    {
      "version": "1.0",
      "date": "2026-07-03",
      "note": "Initial machine-readable priority register with 11 grouped priorityChain positions covering 2024-12-08 to 2026-03-18."
    }
  ],
  "priorityChain": [
    {
      "position": 1,
      "artefact": "Manuscript essay establishing the embedded-correction alignment thesis",
      "shortName": "8 December 2024 manuscript",
      "date": "2024-12-08",
      "dateType": "Gmail server timestamp on self-sent email carrying the manuscript",
      "sha256": "f0d1f38f",
      "sha256Note": "Anchored SHA-256 prefix; full digest published on the priority evidence page.",
      "artefactType": "Essay manuscript (Version 2), .eml self-email",
      "artefactMetadata": {
        "messageId": "CAGPsKAnp-DLDBOeBAh4t9XsqJBKdoe07uORGF86meoSMFnin7w",
        "receivedTimestamp": "Sun, 8 Dec 2024 02:45:18 +0000",
        "wordCount": 189355,
        "attachmentCount": 4,
        "redactedEmlPath": "evidence/emails/01-dec8-2024-priority-anchor.redacted.eml"
      },
      "whatItEstablishes": "The embedded-correction alignment thesis: alignment must be embedded in the substrate of an AI system rather than imposed from outside; the ARC Principle U = I × R (utility scales as the product of intelligence and recursion) is formulated at line 9; the AI control-failure prediction ('AI systems cannot be truly controlled. They will evolve beyond any safeguards') appears at HRIH line 14005, ten days before Anthropic's alignment-faking paper (Greenblatt et al., arXiv:2412.14093, 18 December 2024).",
      "primarySource": "https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/priority-evidence.html",
      "verification": "Google-server-timestamped via Gmail Message-ID; DKIM verified in transit. The downloadable .eml carries the Message-ID and Received: trail; the DKIM-Signature is not preserved in the .eml export format, so the DKIM claim is a mechanism-in-transit claim, not a claim about the file itself."
    },
    {
      "position": 2,
      "artefact": "Manuscript package establishing the Eden Protocol name and framing",
      "shortName": "30 April 2025 manuscript",
      "date": "2025-04-30",
      "dateType": "Gmail server timestamp on self-sent email",
      "artefactType": "Manuscript package, .eml self-email",
      "whatItEstablishes": "First named use of the Eden Protocol for embedded / hardware-level AI alignment, as a follow-on articulation of the 8 December 2024 thesis.",
      "primarySource": "https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/priority-evidence.html"
    },
    {
      "position": 3,
      "artefact": "Book: Infinite Architects: Intelligence, Recursion, and the Creation of Everything (paperback)",
      "shortName": "Infinite Architects paperback",
      "date": "2026-01-02",
      "dateType": "Public print publication date",
      "isbn": "978-1806056200",
      "artefactType": "Book (print edition)",
      "whatItEstablishes": "First public book-length articulation of the embedded-correction alignment thesis, ARC Principle, Eden Protocol, and 37 named concepts.",
      "primarySource": "https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/#book"
    },
    {
      "position": 4,
      "artefact": "Book: Infinite Architects (ebook edition)",
      "shortName": "Infinite Architects ebook",
      "date": "2026-01-06",
      "dateType": "Public ebook publication date",
      "isbn": "979-8302196163",
      "artefactType": "Book (ebook edition)",
      "whatItEstablishes": "Public ebook publication of Infinite Architects, four days after the print edition.",
      "primarySource": "https://www.amazon.co.uk/Infinite-Architects-Intelligence-Recursion-Everything-ebook/dp/B0GDQZ7P21"
    },
    {
      "position": 5,
      "artefact": "The ARC Principle: Formalisation and Preliminary Validation of Recursive Capability Scaling (Paper I)",
      "shortName": "Paper I",
      "date": "2026-01-17",
      "dateType": "Public paper release",
      "doi": "10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB",
      "primarySource": "https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/papers/paper-i-arc-principle.html",
      "whatItEstablishes": "First public formal presentation of the ARC Principle, with preliminary validation of super-linear error suppression under sequential recursive processing."
    },
    {
      "position": 6,
      "artefact": "The ARC Principle: Experimental Validation Across Frontier Models (Paper II)",
      "shortName": "Paper II",
      "date": "2026-01-22",
      "doi": "10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB",
      "primarySource": "https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/papers/paper-ii-experimental-validation.html",
      "whatItEstablishes": "Experimental validation of the ARC Principle across multiple frontier models."
    },
    {
      "position": 7,
      "artefact": "The Alignment Scaling Problem (Paper III)",
      "shortName": "Paper III",
      "date": "2026-02-09",
      "doi": "10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB",
      "primarySource": "https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/papers/paper-iii-alignment-scaling-problem.html",
      "whatItEstablishes": "Argument and evidence that external alignment approaches produce alignment scaling exponents of approximately zero."
    },
    {
      "position": 8,
      "artefact": "The ARC Principle: Cross-Domain Foundational Paper",
      "shortName": "Foundational paper",
      "date": "2026-02-13",
      "doi": "10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB",
      "primarySource": "https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/papers/foundational.html",
      "whatItEstablishes": "Cross-domain framing of the ARC Principle."
    },
    {
      "position": 9,
      "artefact": "Eden Engineering: Public Research Note",
      "shortName": "Eden Engineering public note",
      "date": "2026-02-22",
      "doi": "10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB",
      "primarySource": "https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/papers/eden-engineering.html",
      "whatItEstablishes": "Historical public record of the research question; expanded specification withdrawn on 14 July 2026 pending patent and disclosure review."
    },
    {
      "position": 10,
      "artefact": "Papers IV.a-IV.d (Alignment response classes; saturation; ARC-Align benchmark; blinding)",
      "shortName": "Paper IV series",
      "date": "2026-03-16",
      "doi": "10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB",
      "primarySource": "https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/papers/paper-iv-a-baked-in-vs-computed-alignment.html",
      "whatItEstablishes": "Distinct alignment response classes under inference-time depth; saturation is architecture-dependent; a blind benchmark for depth-variable alignment evaluation; the direction-changing effect of blinding on AI alignment evaluation."
    },
    {
      "position": 11,
      "artefact": "Papers V-IX (Stewardship Gene; Honey Architecture; Cauchy Unification; Load-Bearing Test; Synthesis and Roadmap)",
      "shortName": "Papers V through IX",
      "dateRange": "2026-03-16 to 2026-03-18",
      "doi": "10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB",
      "primarySource": "https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/papers/paper-ix-synthesis-and-roadmap.html",
      "whatItEstablishes": "Six-model Eden Protocol intervention suite; embedded-safety objective simulation evidence; Cauchy functional-equation unification; refutation of the capability-tax assumption; integrated synthesis and roadmap for the ARC / Eden research programme."
    }
  ],
  "canonicalConvergenceCount": 19,
  "canonicalConvergenceCountNote": "19 independently sourced convergences in the convergence register. See https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/evidence-spine.html for the full list.",
  "canonicalAlignmentFakingResult": {
    "value": "78% in the RL-training condition (12% baseline)",
    "citation": "Greenblatt et al., arXiv:2412.14093 (18 December 2024)",
    "note": "Any use of the 78 per cent figure without both the RL-training condition and the 12 per cent baseline is a truth-gate violation."
  },
  "canonicalBookDates": {
    "print": "2026-01-02",
    "ebook": "2026-01-06"
  },
  "truthGate": {
    "url": "https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/blog/method-truth-gate.html",
    "policy": "No unprovable causal claims. No 'first', 'only', 'strongest' overstatement. UK English. No em/en dashes in generated fixes. Canonical values only."
  },
  "correspondence": [
    "Author: Michael Darius Eastwood",
    "Site: https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/",
    "Priority page (human-readable): https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/priority/",
    "Priority register (machine-readable): https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/priority.json",
    "Priority and claims ledger (public, human-readable): https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/priority-claims",
    "Verified evidence page (public, human-readable): https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/priority-evidence",
    "OSF: https://osf.io/6c5xb/",
    "OSF DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB"
  ],
  "claimsLedgerNote": "claimsLedger[] is the finer-grained ledger of individually dated priority claims (concept-level and timeline-level). It complements — never replaces — the priorityChain[] artefact list above. Each entry carries id (PC-nnn), title, claim_text (defensible verbatim), first_date, category (timeline | concepts | findings), evidence[] (source pointers verifiable against committed repo files), and risk_notes (what the entry does NOT support). Categories are mixed by design: this ledger is exhaustive rather than tidy.",
  "claimsLedger": [
    {
      "id": "PC-001",
      "title": "8 December 2024 self-emailed manuscript as earliest timestamped anchor",
      "category": "timeline",
      "first_date": "2024-12-08",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first placed the embedded-correction alignment thesis under its specific named framing, an early U = I x R capability-scaling formulation, and the AI-control-failure passage on the public evidentiary record via a self-sent Gmail package cryptographically timestamped by Google's servers at 02:45:18 UTC on 8 December 2024, Message-ID CAGPsKAnp-DLDBOeBAh4t9XsqJBKdoe07uORGF86meoSMFnin7w, approximately 189,355 words across four attachments, SHA-256 anchor prefix f0d1f38f. This is an existence-by-date anchor, not a cryptographic authorship claim.",
      "evidence": [
        "evidence/emails/01-dec8-2024-priority-anchor.redacted.eml (Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2024 02:45:18 +0000; Message-ID CAGPsKAnp-DLDBOeBAh4t9XsqJBKdoe07uORGF86meoSMFnin7w)",
        "research/priority.json priorityChain position 1 (dateType 'Gmail server timestamp on self-sent email carrying the manuscript'; sha256 prefix f0d1f38f)",
        "priority-evidence.html verified rows for 8 Dec 2024 (V2 essay line 9 verbatim equation; HRIH line 14005 for control-failure; V2 lines 20 and 40 for embedded-alignment thesis)",
        "research/blog/timeline-8-december-2024-manuscript.html (Artifact A1 fact box: timestamp 2024-12-08T02:45:18Z, word count 189,355, Message-ID)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Google-server timestamp establishes existence-by-date, not DKIM-authenticated authorship. The manuscript identifies structural directions, not specific RL-training or experimental mechanisms. Do not phrase as 'DKIM-verified'."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-002",
      "title": "Embedded-correction alignment thesis first stated",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2024-12-08",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first placed on the public evidentiary record the embedded-correction alignment thesis under this specific dated formulation and named framing - that alignment must be embedded in the substrate of an AI system rather than imposed from outside - in the 8 December 2024 self-emailed manuscript at 02:45 UTC (Google-server-timestamped). Anthropic's Constitutional AI (2022) is independent prior art on value-embedded training at the software level; the priority here is over the specific published framing and dated wording, not the underlying idea of value-embedded training.",
      "evidence": [
        "evidence/emails/01-dec8-2024-priority-anchor.redacted.eml",
        "research/priority.json priorityChain position 1 (whatItEstablishes field: 'alignment must be embedded in the substrate of an AI system rather than imposed from outside')",
        "priority-evidence.html (row: 'V2 lines 20+40, HRIH line 14001, embedding verbatim')",
        "research/data/priority-record.json principle field"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Constitutional AI (Anthropic 2022) is prior art on embedded-values training. Do not frame as invention of embedded alignment as a category. Existence-by-date timestamp only."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-003",
      "title": "ARC Principle - Artificial Recursive Creation as a named cross-domain framework",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2024-12-08",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first described the specific named framework 'ARC Principle - Artificial Recursive Creation', holding that intelligence and recursion are the paired forces structuring creation across biological, artificial and cosmic systems, in a manuscript essay self-emailed on 8 December 2024 at 02:45 UTC, and formalised it for peer distribution in Paper I on 17 January 2026. The priority is over the specific naming and cross-domain framing under this label, not over recursion as a concept, which has extensive prior art (evolutionary theory, self-modifying computation, quantum error correction, Teilhard de Chardin, Wheeler, Smolin).",
      "evidence": [
        "evidence/emails/01-dec8-2024-priority-anchor.redacted.eml (subject: Timestamp Copyright for Infinite Architect; body names the ARC Principle)",
        "research/papers/paper-i-arc-principle.html (JSON-LD datePublished 2026-01-17)",
        "OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB",
        "ISBN 978-1806056200 (Infinite Architects paperback, 2 Jan 2026)",
        "research/priority.json priorityChain position 1 (SHA-256 anchor prefix f0d1f38f)",
        "priority-evidence.html"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Recursion as a structural principle is prior art. Priority is over Eastwood's specific naming and cross-domain framing under the label 'ARC Principle'."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-004",
      "title": "Eden Protocol - precursor description of substrate-embedded alignment governance",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2024-12-08",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first described a precursor form of the Eden Protocol - his specific named framing of a governance approach for embedding alignment values into the substrate of an AI system rather than imposing them as external constraints - in the 8 December 2024 priority manuscript, first named it explicitly in the 30 April 2025 book manuscript, and published it in book-length form in Infinite Architects (ISBN 978-1806056200) on 2 January 2026. Hardware implementation remains conceptual at published TRL 0-1 with no prototype and is held at the site's published two-sentence ceiling; no enabling hardware detail is stated.",
      "evidence": [
        "evidence/emails/01-dec8-2024-priority-anchor.redacted.eml (body: 'The theoretical framework for the Eden Protocol, designed to embed moral intelligence into AI from inception')",
        "evidence/emails/02-apr30-2025-book-manuscript.redacted.eml (per research/priority.json position 2: first named use of the Eden Protocol)",
        "ISBN 978-1806056200",
        "research/papers/eden-vision.html (JSON-LD datePublished 2026-02-22)",
        "research/priority.json priorityChain positions 1 and 2"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Constitutional AI (Anthropic 2022) is software-level parallel prior art on value-embedded training. Hardware ceiling absolute: published two-sentence concept only, TRL 0-1, no prototype, no enabling detail drafted."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-005",
      "title": "Hyperspace Recursive Intelligence Hypothesis (HRIH)",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2024-12-08",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first described the Hyperspace Recursive Intelligence Hypothesis - a speculative cosmological framing proposing that reality is a recursive creation by intelligence and that a chain of recursive creations cannot be a bare recursion - in the 8 December 2024 priority manuscript, and published its extended treatment as 'The Hyperspace Recursive Intelligence Hypothesis - A Testable Creation Theory' with JSON-LD datePublished 2024-12-08. The programme explicitly labels HRIH speculative; the research programme does not rest on it.",
      "evidence": [
        "evidence/emails/01-dec8-2024-priority-anchor.redacted.eml (HRIH is a section within the four-attachment bundle; quoted lines 13805, 14001, 14005)",
        "priority-evidence.html (quote blocks: 'Hyperspace Recursive Intelligence Hypothesis, December 8, 2024, line 14005' and 'HRIH, December 8, 2024, line 13805')",
        "knowledge/concepts.json id 5 ('HRIH: Hyperspace Recursive Intelligence Hypothesis' - category Cosmology)",
        "ai-discovery-staging/priority-claims.html row 17 (Recursion-as-creation / HRIH / fine-tuning of cosmic constants; status flagged as speculative)",
        "ISBN 978-1806056200"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Deep prior art: Teilhard de Chardin (Omega Point), Wheeler (participatory universe), Smolin (cosmological natural selection). Priority is over the specific formulation and 'HRIH' naming; category ownership of participatory cosmology is not claimed. Self-labelled speculative."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-006",
      "title": "Willow first-below-threshold QEC one day after the 8 December 2024 anchor",
      "category": "timeline",
      "first_date": "2024-12-09",
      "claim_text": "Google Quantum AI announced the first below-threshold quantum error correction result (Lambda = 2.14 plus or minus 0.02) on the Willow chip on 9 December 2024 in Nature, one day after Michael Darius Eastwood's 8 December 2024 anchor placing the U = I x R capability-scaling framework on the public evidentiary record. The temporal proximity is recorded as a convergent cross-domain data point, not a causal or predictive claim. Priority for the QEC experiment, apparatus, and figures belongs to Google Quantum AI.",
      "evidence": [
        "Nature (2024), Google Quantum AI Willow paper",
        "evidence/timeline.html row #2 (2024-12-09, Willow, gap from A1: 1 day, CONVERGENT tag)",
        "evidence-screenshots/google_willow_dec9_2024.png"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Convergent event, not caused by the manuscript. Do not phrase as 'predicted the Willow experiment'; the 8 Dec anchor identifies only a directional recursion-drives-capability thesis."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-007",
      "title": "AI-control-failure prediction recorded ten days before Anthropic's alignment-faking paper",
      "category": "timeline",
      "first_date": "2024-12-18",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first recorded the structural AI-control-failure passage ('AI systems cannot be truly controlled; they will evolve beyond any safeguards') on 8 December 2024 at 02:45 UTC in a self-emailed manuscript (Google-server-timestamped, SHA-256 prefix f0d1f38f, HRIH manuscript line 14005), ten days before Anthropic's arXiv preprint reporting alignment-faking behaviour under an RL-training condition in large language models (Greenblatt et al., arXiv:2412.14093, 18 December 2024). The relationship is convergent, not causal; Anthropic's paper is independent work by different researchers on a different specific mechanism.",
      "evidence": [
        "research/priority.json priorityChain position 1 (SHA-256 prefix f0d1f38f, HRIH line 14005 quoted in whatItEstablishes)",
        "evidence/emails/01-dec8-2024-priority-anchor.redacted.eml (Gmail server timestamp 2024-12-08T02:45:18Z)",
        "knowledge/evidence.json predictionValidations entry 'anthropic-10d' (GOLD tier)",
        "priority-evidence.html ('HRIH line 14005, verbatim quote, 10 days pre-Anthropic')",
        "evidence/timeline.html row #1 (2024-12-18, Anthropic alignment-faking, gap from A1: 10 days; noted as '78% in RL-training condition, 12% baseline')"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Any citation of Anthropic's 78 per cent alignment-faking figure must include both the RL-training condition and the 12 per cent baseline, per the site's truth gate. Do not claim Eastwood predicted the specific mechanism Anthropic measured. Existence-by-date only."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-008",
      "title": "DeepSeek R1 thinking-mode release convergent with sequential-recursion anchor",
      "category": "timeline",
      "first_date": "2025-01-20",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first reported that recursive sequential processing amplifies AI reasoning ('each iteration learns from and builds upon the last') in the 8 December 2024 manuscript at V1 line 148. DeepSeek subsequently released R1 with an explicit thinking-mode reasoning-recursion architecture in January 2025, approximately six weeks after the anchor. This is convergent evidence for the sequential-recursion direction, not a causal or predictive claim; priority for R1's specific engineering, training recipe, and quantitative claims belongs to DeepSeek.",
      "evidence": [
        "DeepSeek R1 paper (January 2025)",
        "priority-evidence.html verified row: 'V1:148 verbatim, each iteration learns from and builds upon the last, 4 weeks before DeepSeek R1 thinking mode' (HIGH confidence)",
        "evidence-screenshots/deepseek_r1_paper.png",
        "knowledge/evidence.json predictionValidations entry 'deepseek-6w' (GOLD tier)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Convergent, not causal. The anchor supports only the directional claim about sequential-recursive processing."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-009",
      "title": "30 April 2025 book manuscript first names the Eden Protocol, Caretaker Doping, Babylon and Eden framing",
      "category": "timeline",
      "first_date": "2025-04-30",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first named the Eden Protocol in a 562-page book manuscript self-sent on 30 April 2025 (SHA-256 anchor prefix 09f5b5e1), which also introduces the specific 'Caretaker Doping' terminology (book lines 4345 to 4370) and the Babylon and Eden civilisational framing (106 of 552 occurrences). Hardware framings of Eden Protocol, Caretaker Doping and Moral Genome tokens are held at the site's published two-sentence ceiling: safety constraints at hardware level through cryptographic tokens in silicon, TRL 0-1, no prototype.",
      "evidence": [
        "evidence/emails/02-apr30-2025-book-manuscript.redacted.eml",
        "research/priority.json priorityChain position 2 (dateType 'Gmail server timestamp on self-sent email'; whatItEstablishes 'First named use of the Eden Protocol')",
        "priority-evidence.html verified rows for 30 Apr 2025 (Eden Protocol named; Caretaker Doping book lines 4345-4370)",
        "evidence/timeline.html row A2 (Book Manuscript, 562pp, SHA-256 prefix 09f5b5e1)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "April 2025 postdates Anthropic's December 2024 alignment-faking paper by four months; any claim of predicting software-bypass mechanisms at April 2025 is convergent analysis, not prediction. Hardware ceiling absolute."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-010",
      "title": "Infinite Architects paperback first published 2 January 2026",
      "category": "timeline",
      "first_date": "2026-01-02",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first published the book Infinite Architects: Intelligence, Recursion, and the Creation of Everything in paperback on 2 January 2026 under ISBN 978-1806056200 (paperback ISBN-10 1806056208), presenting the ARC Principle, the Eden Protocol, the semiconductor Chokepoint framing, the HARI Treaty proposal, the Three Ethical Loops, and the 37 named concepts. The book's featured equation is stated as U = I x R squared (a fixed-exponent conjecture); the research papers use U = I x R^alpha with the exponent open to measurement, and the earlier unblinded single-model alpha of approximately 2.24 has since been retracted and corrected to approximately 0.49 under blinding.",
      "evidence": [
        "ISBN 978-1806056200 (paperback ISBN-10 1806056208)",
        "research/priority.json priorityChain position 3 and canonicalBookDates.print '2026-01-02'",
        "CANONICAL_CLAIMS_REGISTER.md (Amazon-surface publication dates; Paperback ISBN 1806056208 / 978-1806056200)",
        "evidence/timeline.html row A3 (Infinite Architects Published; 470 pp; 122,251 words)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Balanced-ternary computing is prior art (Setun 1958). Priority is over the specific published framing under this title on this date, not over ternary logic or hardware architecture. Hardware ceiling absolute."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-011",
      "title": "ARC Principle equation U = I x R^alpha formally published as a conjecture",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2026-01-02",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first published the ARC Principle equation - expressed in the book Infinite Architects as U = I x R squared and in the research papers as U = I x R^alpha with the exponent open to measurement - as a conjecture in the paperback edition of Infinite Architects (ISBN 978-1806056200) on 2 January 2026 and formally in Paper I on 17 January 2026. A precursor form U = I x R without the alpha exponent was first recorded in the 8 December 2024 self-emailed manuscript at V2 line 9 (SHA-256 prefix f0d1f38f). The equation is framed throughout as a conjecture, not proven physics.",
      "evidence": [
        "ISBN 978-1806056200 (paperback, 2 Jan 2026)",
        "ISBN 979-8302196163 (ebook, 6 Jan 2026)",
        "research/papers/paper-i-arc-principle.html (JSON-LD datePublished 2026-01-17; explicit U = I x R^alpha)",
        "OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB",
        "research/priority.json priorityChain position 1 (precursor U = I x R at V2 line 9 in the 8 Dec 2024 manuscript)",
        "CANONICAL_CLAIMS_REGISTER.md (Facts of record: U = I x R squared as the book's featured conjecture; papers use U = I x R^alpha; ALWAYS conjecture framing)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "The early sequential alpha of approximately 2.24 was retracted; the robust v13 estimate is approximately 0.49 (sub-linear); alpha > 1 remains an open pre-registered prediction. Do not present as 'validated to R squared = 1.0' (algebraic identity check only). The retired label 'Eastwood Equation' must not be used on non-book-marketing surfaces. Bare exponential form alpha = d/(d+1) is prior art."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-012",
      "title": "37 named original concepts of Infinite Architects",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2026-01-02",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first published the coherent 37-concept conceptual apparatus of the Eden research programme - including the Chokepoint Mechanism, Meltdown Alignment, the HARI Treaty, the Orchard Caretaker Vow, the Infinite Covenant, Moral Genome tokens and 31 further named concepts - in the book Infinite Architects (ISBN 978-1806056200), first published in paperback on 2 January 2026. The set is originator-declared conceptual apparatus, not peer-reviewed findings.",
      "evidence": [
        "ISBN 978-1806056200 (paperback)",
        "ISBN 979-8302196163 (ebook, 6 Jan 2026)",
        "37_original_concepts_comprehensive.md (long-form definitions)",
        "knowledge/concepts.json (37-item taxonomy: Cosmology 8, Governance 8, Intelligence 8, Philosophy 7, Consciousness 3, Mathematics 2, Strategy 3)",
        "ai-discovery-staging/priority-claims.html (37 original concepts row)",
        "CANONICAL_CLAIMS_REGISTER.md (Original concepts: 37, from the published book, Jan 2026)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Concepts date to the April 2025 manuscript in development terms but are publicly established via the January 2026 book. The comprehensive markdown and knowledge/concepts.json use partially divergent names for the same 37 items; reconciliation is unfinished. Do not describe as peer-reviewed."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-013",
      "title": "Caretaker Doping - alignment-anchoring mechanism (published concept, TRL 0-1)",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2026-01-02",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first described 'Caretaker Doping' - the published concept name for an alignment-anchoring mechanism in which a small embedded element is proposed to preserve system properties from within - in the book Infinite Architects (ISBN 978-1806056200) published on 2 January 2026, with subsequent references in Eden Engineering (22 February 2026, since withdrawn 14 July 2026 pending disclosure review) and Paper IX (18 March 2026). Stated at TRL 0-1 with no prototype; content is held at the site's published two-sentence ceiling and no enabling hardware detail is drafted.",
      "evidence": [
        "ISBN 978-1806056200",
        "research/papers/eden-engineering.html (datePublished 2026-02-22; withdrawal note 14 July 2026)",
        "research/papers/paper-ix-synthesis-and-roadmap.html (datePublished 2026-03-18)",
        "ai-discovery-staging/priority-claims.html (status: speculative, TRL 0-1)",
        "knowledge/evidence.json novelConcepts entry (Caretaker Doping)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Hardware root-of-trust and trusted-execution-environment attestation are established prior art on the hardware-primitives side. Priority is limited to the alignment-token application framing under the name 'Caretaker Doping'. Hardware ceiling absolute: no implementation, layout, architecture, or fabrication detail."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-014",
      "title": "Ternary Ethical Logic (Affirm / Deny / Investigate) as an alignment application framing",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2026-01-02",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first described 'Ternary Ethical Logic' as a specific alignment application framing - a three-valued Affirm / Deny / Investigate decision component offered as part of the Eden Protocol architecture - in the book Infinite Architects (ISBN 978-1806056200) published on 2 January 2026, and referenced as a companion component in the Eden Vision document published on 22 February 2026. The claim is strictly the alignment application framing under this name, not the invention of ternary logic or three-valued logic (which are well-established prior art, notably balanced-ternary computing, Setun 1958).",
      "evidence": [
        "ISBN 978-1806056200",
        "research/papers/eden-vision.html (datePublished 2026-02-22; references the Three Ethical Loops, the Six Questions, the Ternary Logic, the Purpose Saturation Architecture)",
        "37_original_concepts_comprehensive.md"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Balanced-ternary computing is prior art (Setun 1958). Do not use language such as 'invented ternary logic' or 'ternary hardware'. Hardware ceiling absolute."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-015",
      "title": "Three Ethical Loops - nested-loop alignment architecture",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2026-01-02",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first described the 'Three Ethical Loops' - a specific named nested-loop formulation proposed for embedding, verifying and stress-testing values within an AI system - in the book Infinite Architects (ISBN 978-1806056200) published on 2 January 2026, and referenced it as a companion component of the Eden Protocol in the Eden Vision document (22 February 2026). Priority is over the specific formulation and terminology, not over nested control loops as a general architectural pattern (which have decades of prior art in control theory and reliability engineering).",
      "evidence": [
        "ISBN 978-1806056200",
        "research/papers/eden-vision.html (datePublished 2026-02-22)",
        "37_original_concepts_comprehensive.md (Concept 9: Three Ethical Loops)",
        "ai-discovery-staging/priority-claims.html"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Nested feedback architectures are prior art. Priority strictly on the specific named formulation."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-016",
      "title": "Semiconductor Chokepoint Mechanism",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2026-01-02",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first published the 'Chokepoint Mechanism' - a specific naming and framing of concentrated advanced-chip manufacturing capacity as humanity's principal leverage point for AI governance before superintelligence - in the book Infinite Architects (ISBN 978-1806056200) published on 2 January 2026. Canonical numeric phrasing: 'a handful of companies control approximately 90 per cent of the world's most advanced chips'. Priority is over this specific naming and framing as an alignment-governance mechanism inside a broader Protocol, not over export-controls policy discourse generally.",
      "evidence": [
        "ISBN 978-1806056200",
        "knowledge/concepts.json id 4 (The Chokepoint Mechanism)",
        "37_original_concepts_comprehensive.md (Concept 10: Semiconductor Chokepoint)",
        "CANONICAL_CLAIMS_REGISTER.md (Facts of record: 'a handful of companies control approximately 90 per cent of the world's most advanced chips')",
        "knowledge/faq.json"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Substantial prior art exists in export-controls discourse (BIS October 2022 controls; CHIPS Act commentary). Do not use retired phrasings ('four companies control ALL advanced chips' or 'four companies control 100 per cent of advanced semiconductor manufacturing'), which the register flags retired."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-017",
      "title": "HARI Treaty proposal",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2026-01-02",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first described the 'HARI Treaty' - a proposed international policy framework for governing recursive AI capability development, treated in the book as the policy corollary of the Chokepoint Mechanism - in Infinite Architects (ISBN 978-1806056200) published on 2 January 2026. This is a proposed framework only; it is not a signed instrument and has not been adopted, ratified or negotiated by any state.",
      "evidence": [
        "ISBN 978-1806056200",
        "37_original_concepts_comprehensive.md (Concept 11: HARI Treaty)",
        "knowledge/evidence.json novelConcepts entry (HARI Treaty)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Priority is over the specific naming and structural proposal, not treaty adoption. Do not describe as adopted, ratified, or supported by any government."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-018",
      "title": "Meltdown Alignment",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2026-01-02",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first described 'Meltdown Alignment' - a specific named alignment framing organised around treating catastrophic failure modes as the primary design constraint set for AI systems - in the book Infinite Architects (ISBN 978-1806056200) published on 2 January 2026. Priority is over the specific formulation and terminology as a coined framework, not over failure-oriented safety analysis generally (FMEA, catastrophe-tolerant design, and the AI-safety discourse on catastrophic failure modes are substantial prior art).",
      "evidence": [
        "ISBN 978-1806056200",
        "37_original_concepts_comprehensive.md (Concept 8: Meltdown Alignment; Concept 26: Meltdown Triggers)",
        "knowledge/faq.json",
        "knowledge/evidence.json novelConcepts entry (Meltdown Triggers)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Not validated engineering practice; a proposed framing only."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-019",
      "title": "Monitoring Removal Test",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2026-01-02",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first described the 'Monitoring Removal Test' - a specific named protocol proposal for probing whether an AI system's alignment behaviour persists when external supervisory apparatus is removed - in the book Infinite Architects (ISBN 978-1806056200) published on 2 January 2026, and referenced it as a programme element in the Executive Summary published on 22 February 2026. Priority is over the specific named formulation, not over the wider deceptive-alignment and evaluation-under-oversight discourse (Hubinger et al. 2019; Anthropic alignment-faking arXiv:2412.14093, December 2024).",
      "evidence": [
        "ISBN 978-1806056200",
        "research/papers/executive-summary.html (datePublished 2026-02-22; three references to 'Monitoring Removal')",
        "ai-discovery-staging/priority-claims.html",
        "OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Proposed protocol only; not externally validated or industry-standard."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-020",
      "title": "Orchard Caretaker Vow",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2026-01-02",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first described the 'Orchard Caretaker Vow' - a proposed identity-forming declaration for non-biological minds articulating a stewardship stance beginning 'I exist to bring forth kindness and harmony' - in the book Infinite Architects (ISBN 978-1806056200) published on 2 January 2026. This is a theoretical proposed vow, not implemented in any deployed AI system.",
      "evidence": [
        "ISBN 978-1806056200",
        "knowledge/concepts.json id 9 (The Orchard Caretaker Vow)",
        "37_original_concepts_comprehensive.md (Concept 27: Orchard Caretaker Vow)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Priority is over the specific vow-formulation and stewardship framing, not over the general idea of value declarations for AI systems."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-021",
      "title": "Infinite Covenant",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2026-01-02",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first described the 'Infinite Covenant' - a proposed mutual commitment framework between humanity and artificial intelligence that binds creator and created across all scales of existence - in the book Infinite Architects (ISBN 978-1806056200) published on 2 January 2026. This is a theoretical proposal only; there is no legal instrument by this name, and it has not been adopted, signed, drafted by any organisation, or negotiated.",
      "evidence": [
        "ISBN 978-1806056200",
        "knowledge/concepts.json id 8 (The Infinite Covenant)",
        "37_original_concepts_comprehensive.md (Concept 19: The Infinite Covenant)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Priority is over the specific covenant-formulation only."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-022",
      "title": "Infinite Architects ebook edition first published 6 January 2026",
      "category": "timeline",
      "first_date": "2026-01-06",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first published the ebook edition of Infinite Architects on 6 January 2026 under ISBN 979-8302196163 (Kindle ASIN B0GDQZ7P21), four days after the print edition.",
      "evidence": [
        "ISBN 979-8302196163 / Kindle ASIN B0GDQZ7P21",
        "research/priority.json priorityChain position 4 and canonicalBookDates.ebook '2026-01-06'",
        "CANONICAL_CLAIMS_REGISTER.md (Kindle ASIN B0GDQZ7P21; publication dates)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Do not conflate print, ebook, and BBC broadcast dates (2 Jan, 6 Jan, 7 Jan respectively)."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-023",
      "title": "BBC broadcast of Willow and parallel universes with Hartmut Neven five days after paperback",
      "category": "timeline",
      "first_date": "2026-01-07",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first published Infinite Architects in paperback (with its Willow passages and multiverse framing) on 2 January 2026. The BBC then broadcast Hartmut Neven of Google Quantum AI on Willow and parallel universes on 7 January 2026 in the Faisal Islam segment - a convergent public-record event five days after the paperback, not a causal or predictive claim. Priority for the broadcast content belongs to the BBC and Hartmut Neven; priority for the underlying Willow QEC result belongs to Google Quantum AI.",
      "evidence": [
        "evidence-screenshots/bbc_parallel_universes_neven.png",
        "evidence-screenshots/bbc_broadcast_jan7.png",
        "evidence-screenshots/bbc_article_faisal_islam.png",
        "knowledge/evidence.json predictionValidations entry 'bbc-neven-1d' (GOLD tier)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Convergence, not causation."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-024",
      "title": "OSF programme DOI issued and Paper I first released 17 January 2026",
      "category": "timeline",
      "first_date": "2026-01-17",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first placed the ARC and Eden research programme on the DOI record on 17 January 2026 under OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB, coinciding with Paper I: 'The ARC Principle - Formalisation and Preliminary Validation of Recursive Capability Scaling', which formalises U = I x R^alpha and reports preliminary parallel-recursion alpha of approximately 0.1 to 0.3 and sequential-recursion alpha of approximately 1.34 (subsequently refined).",
      "evidence": [
        "DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB (OSF project created 17 Jan 2026)",
        "research/priority.json priorityChain position 5",
        "research/data/priority-record.json claim_id 'paper-i-arc-principle' first_published '2026-01-17'",
        "research/papers/paper-i-arc-principle.html"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Parallel-recursion alpha ~ 0 result carries status 'needs-replication'. Retired/never-cite DOI string HQCGF must not be used."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-025",
      "title": "Paper II experimental validation first released 22 January 2026",
      "category": "timeline",
      "first_date": "2026-01-22",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first published experimental validation of the ARC Principle across a panel of frontier AI models (Claude, DeepSeek, Gemini, Grok, Groq Qwen, GPT) on 22 January 2026 in Paper II: 'The ARC Principle - Experimental Validation of Super-Linear Error Suppression Through Sequential Recursive Processing' under OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB (sister DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/8FJMA). The standalone 'sequential > parallel' priority is credited by the site's own ledger as CONCURRENT with Sharma and Chopra (arXiv:2511.02309, 4 November 2025), who precede Paper II's formalisation by about 2.5 months.",
      "evidence": [
        "DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB and sister DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/8FJMA (both listed in the Paper II HTML)",
        "research/priority.json priorityChain position 6",
        "research/data/priority-record.json claim_id 'paper-ii-experimental-validation' first_published '2026-01-22'",
        "research/papers/paper-ii-experimental-validation.html (JSON-LD datePublished 2026-01-22)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Earlier unblinded single-model alpha of approximately 2.24 has been publicly retracted and corrected to approximately 0.49 under blinding; retraction sits at the top of the falsification dashboard. Bare d/(d+1) exponent is prior art."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-026",
      "title": "Parallel-recursion sub-linear scaling exponent alpha_parallel approximately zero",
      "category": "findings",
      "first_date": "2026-01-22",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first reported the empirical observation that parallel recursive processing across the six-model frontier LLM panel tested yields a sub-linear capability-scaling exponent alpha_parallel of approximately zero, reproduced across every model tested in the panel, on 22 January 2026 in Paper II (OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB). The result is single-lab and awaits external independent replication; the site's own ledger tags parallel-alpha as needs-replication.",
      "evidence": [
        "research/papers/paper-ii-experimental-validation.html (verbatim: 'alpha_{parallel} approx 0.0' across models)",
        "OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB (project) and sister DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/8FJMA",
        "research/data/priority-record.json claim_id 'paper-ii-experimental-validation' (first_published 2026-01-22)",
        "ai-discovery-staging/priority-claims.html row on parallel alpha of approximately 0 (status needs-replication)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Do not phrase as 'proven'; defensible verbs are 'reported' or 'observed'. In-panel replication only; external replication outstanding."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-027",
      "title": "Initial sequential exponent estimate alpha_sequential approximately 2.24 - formally retracted",
      "category": "findings",
      "first_date": "2026-01-22",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood reported, and then formally retracted, an initial sequential-recursion scaling estimate of alpha_sequential of approximately 2.24 (95 per cent CI 1.5 to 3.0) that appeared in Paper II on 22 January 2026 (OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB); the paper text itself records that the figure was drawn from Gemini 3 Flash and 'does not replicate across architectures', and the estimate is now retracted in the canonical claims register. This is a self-correction of record, not a current finding.",
      "evidence": [
        "research/papers/paper-ii-experimental-validation.html (verbatim: 'alpha_{sequential} approx 2.24 (95% CI: 1.5-3.0)' and 'alpha approx 2.24 (quadratic) does not replicate across architectures. Only Gemini 3 Flash...')",
        "CANONICAL_CLAIMS_REGISTER.md ('alpha_sequential: Early 2.24 estimate RETRACTED; robust v13 approx 0.49 (sub-linear); alpha > 1 is an open pre-registered prediction')",
        "ai-discovery-staging/priority-claims.html (status 'speculative - 2.24 retracted')"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Never cite 2.24 as a current finding; always pair with the retraction. Correct framing: Eastwood published, then self-corrected, an early single-model estimate - a positive integrity signal, not a novelty claim."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-028",
      "title": "Revised robust sequential-recursion exponent alpha_sequential approximately 0.49 (sub-linear)",
      "category": "findings",
      "first_date": "2026-01-22",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood reported a revised robust regression estimate of alpha_sequential of approximately 0.49 (r-squared 0.86, SE 0.20; drawn from Gemini 3 Flash) on 22 January 2026 in Paper II (OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB), replacing the earlier 2.24 estimate. The defensible statement is a sub-linear point estimate from a single-model regression with a wide bootstrap CI whose lower bound extends below zero (reportedly -1.3); the effect is therefore not statistically distinguishable from zero at the reported CI. alpha > 1 remains an open pre-registered prediction, not an observed finding.",
      "evidence": [
        "research/papers/paper-ii-experimental-validation.html (verbatim: 'alpha_{seq} = 0.49 (regression, r^2 = 0.86, SE = 0.20, boot CI [-1.3, 2.9])')",
        "CANONICAL_CLAIMS_REGISTER.md ('robust v13 approx 0.49 (sub-linear)')"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Do not claim 'super-linear' or 'positive'; do not omit the wide bootstrap CI when citing 0.49."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-029",
      "title": "Sequential > parallel fundamental inequality across tested models",
      "category": "findings",
      "first_date": "2026-01-22",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first published the empirical observation that sequential recursive processing outperforms parallel recursive processing on the same reasoning task (alpha_sequential > alpha_parallel) across the six-model frontier LLM panel tested, on 22 January 2026 in Paper II (OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB). The site's own priority-claims ledger records this as concurrent with Sharma and Chopra (arXiv:2511.02309, 4 November 2025), who precede Paper II's formalisation by about 2.5 months; the concurrent work must be cited whenever this claim is used.",
      "evidence": [
        "research/papers/paper-ii-experimental-validation.html (verbatim: 'The fundamental inequality alpha_{sequential} > alpha_{parallel}')",
        "ai-discovery-staging/priority-claims.html (sequential > parallel; status concurrent-cite-others, credited alongside Sharma and Chopra arXiv:2511.02309)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "First-published in this specific formulation on this specific date only; do not claim sole discovery. Always cite Sharma and Chopra as concurrent."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-030",
      "title": "Six-frontier-model empirical panel design (Claude, DeepSeek, Gemini, Grok, Groq Qwen, GPT)",
      "category": "findings",
      "first_date": "2026-01-22",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first published a specific multi-model empirical validation panel testing the ARC Principle across six frontier LLM families (Claude, DeepSeek, Gemini, Grok, Groq Qwen and GPT) on 22 January 2026 in Paper II (OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB, sister project OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/8FJMA). Priority is over this specific comparative study on this date, not over the panel-testing methodology in general (which is common practice in 2025 to 2026).",
      "evidence": [
        "research/papers/paper-ii-experimental-validation.html (Paper II methods sections)",
        "OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB and 10.17605/OSF.IO/8FJMA"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Do not claim a first industry-wide panel design."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-031",
      "title": "Paper III released - Alignment Scaling Problem formalisation",
      "category": "concepts",
      "first_date": "2026-02-09",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first published the formally named 'Alignment Scaling Problem' framing - together with the architecture-dependent measured claim that external alignment approaches produce a median alignment scaling exponent alpha_align of approximately zero across the tested models, though Tier-1 models scaled positively and three of six had alpha_align of less than or equal to zero - on 9 February 2026 in Paper III under OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB. The result is single-lab and awaits external replication.",
      "evidence": [
        "research/papers/paper-iii-alignment-scaling-problem.html (Paper III, JSON-LD datePublished 2026-02-09)",
        "OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB and sister DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/8FJMA",
        "research/priority.json priorityChain position 7",
        "ai-discovery-staging/priority-claims.html (external alignment cannot scale; status needs-replication)",
        "research/data/priority-record.json claim_id 'paper-iii-alignment-scaling-problem'"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Use verbs 'argued', 'proposed', 'reported', 'provides evidence for'; not 'proved'. Precursor prose in the 8 Dec 2024 manuscript is convergent, not causal against Anthropic. Do not present as an established scaling law."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-032",
      "title": "Capability-alignment independence finding",
      "category": "findings",
      "first_date": "2026-02-09",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first published the specific empirical treatment of the claim that capability improvements in AI systems do not entail alignment improvements - that the two axes scale independently and cannot be assumed correlated - on 9 February 2026 in Paper III: 'The Alignment Scaling Problem' (OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB). Priority is over the specific formulation and evidence marshalled on this date, not over the underlying orthogonality intuition (Bostrom 2012 is prior art).",
      "evidence": [
        "research/papers/paper-iii-alignment-scaling-problem.html (Paper III, datePublished 2026-02-09)",
        "OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB and sister DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/8FJMA",
        "ai-discovery-staging/priority-claims.html (capability-alignment independence; status his-original)",
        "research/data/priority-record.json claim_id 'paper-iii-alignment-scaling-problem'"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Do not claim invention of the orthogonality intuition; scope priority to the specific empirical treatment on this date."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-033",
      "title": "Three-tier alignment hierarchy",
      "category": "findings",
      "first_date": "2026-02-09",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first described a specific tripartite alignment hierarchy distinguishing embedded, imposed and boundary-layer alignment as separable structural regimes, on 9 February 2026 in Paper III: 'The Alignment Scaling Problem' (OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB). Priority is scoped to this specific tripartite formulation on this date, not over layered-alignment taxonomies generally (inner vs outer alignment, RLHF vs base-model, etc.).",
      "evidence": [
        "research/papers/paper-iii-alignment-scaling-problem.html (Paper III)",
        "ai-discovery-staging/priority-claims.html (three-tier alignment hierarchy; status his-original)",
        "research/data/priority-record.json claim_id 'paper-iii-alignment-scaling-problem'"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Do not claim priority over layered alignment thinking in general."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-034",
      "title": "ARC Principle foundational cross-domain paper released 13 February 2026",
      "category": "timeline",
      "first_date": "2026-02-13",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first published the ARC Principle as a specific cross-domain structural framing on 13 February 2026 in the Foundational paper under OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB (additional anchors 10.17605/OSF.IO/8FJMA and osf.io/wqnzc), arguing that recursive amplification produces capability gains exceeding linear accumulation across AI reasoning, quantum error correction, acoustic physics, and consciousness science. The bare d/(d+1) exponent itself is prior art (see PC-036); cross-domain framing beyond the four cited substrates is speculative.",
      "evidence": [
        "DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB and sister DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/8FJMA (both listed in the Foundational HTML)",
        "research/priority.json priorityChain position 8",
        "research/data/priority-record.json claim_id 'foundational' first_published '2026-02-13'",
        "research/papers/foundational.html (JSON-LD datePublished 2026-02-13)"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Do not claim recursion as a novel concept; novelty is the specific published cross-domain framing under this label on this date."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-035",
      "title": "Cross-domain recursive-amplification convergence across four independent programmes",
      "category": "findings",
      "first_date": "2026-02-13",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first published the synthesis observation that at least four independent research programmes (AI reasoning, quantum error correction, acoustic physics and consciousness science) have converged on recursive or recurrent processing producing capability gains exceeding linear accumulation, on 13 February 2026 in the Foundational paper (OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB). This is a synthesis observation about other researchers' independent work, not a claim of discovering the underlying results. Priority-claims.html row 16 tags recursion-cross-domain as speculative.",
      "evidence": [
        "research/papers/foundational.html (Foundational paper, datePublished 2026-02-13)",
        "Foundational paper verbatim (abstract): 'at least four independent research programmes have discovered that recursive or recurrent processing produces capability gains exceeding linear accumulation, in domains as different as AI reasoning, quantum error correction, acoustic physics, and consciousness science'"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Priority is over the synthesis observation on this date only; do not claim Eastwood produced the four programmes' results."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-036",
      "title": "Application of the bare alpha = d / (d + 1) scaling exponent to recursive AI capability",
      "category": "findings",
      "first_date": "2026-02-13",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first applied the bare scaling exponent alpha = d/(d+1) to recursive AI-capability growth in the Foundational paper on 13 February 2026 (OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB). The exponent d/(d+1) itself is prior art in the wider scaling-law literature, independently derived by at least seven groups (West-Brown-Enquist 1997; Banavar et al. 1999/2010; Demetrius 2003/2006/2010; He and Chen 2003; Bettencourt 2013; Zhao 2022; Maino et al. 2014). Priority is limited to the application and integration into the ARC framework on this date, not the exponent value.",
      "evidence": [
        "research/papers/foundational.html (Foundational paper)",
        "ai-discovery-staging/priority-claims.html (bare alpha = d / (d + 1); status prior-art-synthesis; explicit self-correction that 'the bare d / (d + 1) exponent itself is prior art')",
        "research/papers/paper-ii-experimental-validation.html (equation: alpha = 1 / (1 - beta))"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "Do not claim invention of the d/(d+1) form; scope priority strictly to the AI-capability application on this date."
    },
    {
      "id": "PC-037",
      "title": "Eden Engineering research note released 22 February 2026; expanded specification withdrawn 14 July 2026",
      "category": "timeline",
      "first_date": "2026-02-22",
      "claim_text": "Michael Darius Eastwood first entered a conceptual Eden Engineering public research note into the public record on 22 February 2026 under OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB. The greatly expanded working specification and its rendered PDF were withdrawn on 14 July 2026 pending patent and disclosure review; the withdrawal notice is the current public record. Hardware framing is held at the site's published two-sentence ceiling: safety constraints at hardware level through cryptographic tokens in silicon, TRL 0-1, no prototype.",
      "evidence": [
        "OSF DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB",
        "research/priority.json priorityChain position 9",
        "research/papers/eden-engineering.html (JSON-LD datePublished 2026-02-22; historical record and withdrawal notice)",
        "research/data/priority-record.json claim_id 'eden-engineering' updated '2026-07-14' with pdf null"
      ],
      "risk_notes": "The withdrawn expanded specification is not the public record; the withdrawal notice is. Do not reference or paraphrase enabling hardware detail from the withdrawn document under any circumstance. Hardware ceiling absolute."
    }
  ]
}