← All Posts

2026 Archive

• Babel collapses under its own weight: what the image is doing
• Babylon and Eden: the fork at the heart of Infinite Architects
• Babylon and Eden: the civilisational fork in one image
• The book's treatment of Bostrom and the simulation hypothesis
• : the book's substrate-level thesis
• Caretaker doping: the load-bearing architecture idea
• Cosmic and fine-tuning
• What the book says about DeepSeek and the acceleration
• The Eden Mark: certification with teeth
• Graduated autonomy: earning capability by demonstrating orientation
• Love as architecture: the book's central reframing
• and Meltdown Alignment
• The monitoring-removal test: what changes when the observer looks away
• : cryptographic verification of the substrate architecture
• The parent watching the child walk away
• The Purpose Kernel: the core of the Purpose Loop
• The Purpose, Love and Moral Loops in depth
• The Stewardship Gene: a biological analogy for hereditary caretaker orientation
• The Ark and the Arc: ARC as vessel of stewardship
• The caretaker's greenhouse: the coral reef passage
• The HARI Treaty proposal
• The Three Pillars: Harmony, Stewardship, Flourishing
• The tower that collapsed under its own incoherence
• The Vow: reading the Orchard Caretaker's statement
• The Willow passages: what the book actually says
• Three Polymaths: Rumi, Teilhard, Leibniz
• U = I x R^2: the book's presentation of the equation
• What the book says about alignment faking
• Claim 12 explained: super-linearity as retracted-and-corrected
• Claim 18 explained:
• : definition, origin and status
• : definition, origin and status
• : definition, origin and status
• : definition, origin and status
• : definition, origin and status
• Ternary Ethical Routing: definition, origin and status
• Eden Engineering: public research note
• The Eden Protocol vision in plain English
• The programme executive summary in plain English
• The ARC Principle in plain English
• The ARC Principle in plain English
• Paper II: what the retraction actually says
• Paper III: why external safety measures cannot keep up
• Paper IV-a: three tiers, not two, and one that reverses
• Paper IV-b: alignment does not saturate the same way for every model
• ARC-Align: a blind benchmark for depth-variable alignment
• When blinding flips the sign: why alignment scores need clinical-trial controls
• Synthesis and roadmap: an honest ledger of the ARC/Eden programme
• The 18-paper suite: a reading order
• The stewardship gene: caring about people as the foundational alignment trait
• The honey architecture: what happens when safety is baked into the objective
• Cauchy unification: an old mathematics as a scaling-law classifier
• The load-bearing test: what really survived the Eden Protocol tests
• The ARC Co-Scaling Law: what actually keeps a self-improving AI safe
• The convergence register: 22 claimed arrivals at the same principle
• and the fourteen-month hardware convergence
• The night of 8 December 2024: what the manuscript actually said
• April 2025: the manuscript that first named the Eden Protocol