Peer Review

The research programme is not peer-reviewed, and it says so wherever the question could arise. The papers are self-published on the Open Science Framework with code, data and stated falsification conditions: openly auditable, and not represented as formal external peer review. The deciding study designs are written, dated and prepared as draft registrations awaiting human submission, and independent external replication has not yet occurred; Paper IX names it as the open step.

What the record offers instead of peer review, and the limits of that substitute, is treated in full at ‘You are not peer reviewed.’ Correct. The direct answer with evidence links is at Is this research peer-reviewed?

Part of the ARC-Eden research programme by Michael Darius Eastwood. For the paper suite, see the research papers. For priority claims, see the priority claims ledger.