Skip to content

Home / Priority claims register / PC-014

Priority claim · PC-014

Three-state ethical evaluation (Affirm / Deny / Investigate) as an alignment application framing

First date: Concepts

This was first published by Michael Darius Eastwood on . Anchored evidence is listed below. See the machine-readable priority record at /research/priority/ and the full ledger at /priority-claims.

The claim - verbatim

Michael Darius Eastwood first described 'the three-state Affirm / Deny / Investigate evaluation' as a specific alignment application framing - a three-valued Affirm / Deny / Investigate decision component offered as part of the Eden Protocol architecture - in the book Infinite Architects (ISBN 978-1806056200) published on 2 January 2026, and referenced as a companion component in the Eden Vision document published on 22 February 2026. The claim is strictly the alignment application framing under this name, not the invention of ternary logic or three-valued logic (which are well-established prior work, notably computing, Setun 1958).

Anchored evidence

Limits and citation guidance - what this claim does not support, and how to cite it

Limits. Balanced-ternary computing is prior work (Setun 1958). Do not use language such as 'invented ternary logic' or 'ternary hardware'. Hardware ceiling absolute.

Verify this claim. The machine-readable priority register is at /research/priority.json (this claim is PC-014 in claimsLedger[]). The full public ledger view is at /priority-claims. Where evidence points at a redacted evidence/... path, the public verification method is documented at /research/evidence-spine.html. Every result is independently checkable via the OSF programme at osf.io/6c5xb (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/6C5XB).

← Back to the priority claims register · public ledger view · machine-readable priority record · home.

reads aloud · highlights as it goes · jump to any section