Litigation Platform · Built from Lived Experience
Eden Legal AI
An author-built litigation-support prototype with 20 integrated modules, designed to assist checking selected filings against a versioned CPR corpus, with neurodivergent-first design. Built by a litigant in person during active proceedings because the tools he needed did not exist. Outputs require qualified human verification and do not constitute legal advice. The founder uses the underlying system in his own legal work; the hosted app remains a private beta.
Why Eden Legal AI exists. The platform was built from lived necessity during complex proceedings. It exists because its builder needed it to survive. Every module was designed under the pressure of real court deadlines: the builder had to represent himself, so he built the tools he needed. The result is a litigation operating system that enforces procedural correctness at every step. It is the practical counterpart to the theoretical Eden Protocol: embedded constraints producing correct outcomes.
Platform Modules
Case Management
Multi-case tracking, NEXIS exhibit codes, defendant management, repository-first data architecture.
Evidence System
SHA-256 hashed exhibits, cryptographic provenance, chain-of-custody verification, exhibit register.
Protection Tracking
Statutory breathing-space and protection tracking, with automatic flagging of protected periods and their deadlines.
CPR Compliance
Deadline calculator, Denton test, service rules, court fee calculator, filing readiness gate.
Document Drafting
Admin notices, skeleton arguments, N244 applications, witness statements. PD-compliant output.
Silk Tribunal
Multi-agent AI review. Adversarial analysis of legal arguments. 25-agent panels.
Evidence Chain
Visual graph of evidence relationships. Fact-to-exhibit-to-ground linking.
Legal AI Assistant
Streaming AI chat. Case-context-aware responses. Citation verification.
Access the Legal Platform
Private beta. Public sign-in is not yet open. Eden Legal AI is a private application with authentication and matter-scoped access, and the founder’s case material remains private. Official-source checking is implemented in the command-line toolkit, which includes citation resolution and word-for-word quotation checks against the National Archives’ Find Case Law, with reference tools for legislation and the Civil Procedure Rules.
Public: Research Private: Case Data + Drafting Court-Facing: Gated + Human-Approved