Run it, do not believe it: the full experiments index, every suite with its commands

Replicate

One card per replicable result, carrying the exact commands as they are published on the record, verbatim, with their pins and repositories. Nothing here is paraphrased. If a command is missing, the honest line below says so instead of pretending.

Verify the 8 December 2024 manuscript anchor (SHA-256)

shasum -a 256 dec8-2024-manuscript.eml

Pin: SHA-256 f0d1f38ffd8546152d9d9d28dc5ec083c16a35858f2c12b63e69db7ed50901ad (sent-side digest, first published on day one; source file supplied on request, hash-anchored)

f0d1f38ffd8546152d9d9d28dc5ec083c16a35858f2c12b63e69db7ed50901ad

Repo: arc-principle-validation/priority-claims (the anchored files and receipts)

Source: research/evidence-spine.html (§'Run it yourself' step 1); referenced from research/evidence-portal/index.html §'Verify the record yourself' step 2 and verify/index.html step 3

Verify a held April 2025 source (SHA-256)

shasum -a 256 <file>

Pin: SHA-256 09f5b5e156ed96f8883eaf668495fd350898ce62be6294b8f788e0e2d6dcb664

09f5b5e156ed96f8883eaf668495fd350898ce62be6294b8f788e0e2d6dcb664

Source: research/evidence-portal/index.html §'Verify the record yourself' step 3 (expected digest published; command is the same shasum invocation quoted verbatim on the same page in step 2)

Clone the ARC Principle Validation repository (papers, experiment code, result files, priority material, MIT-licensed)

git clone https://github.com/MichaelDariusEastwood/arc-principle-validation
cd arc-principle-validation

Start with PRIORITY-VERIFY.md, which walks every priority claim through the check that would break it, and EXPERIMENTS-INDEX.md, which maps each paper to the experiment that produced it.

Repo: arc-principle-validation/EXPERIMENTS-INDEX.md (every suite, with commands)

Source: research/evidence-spine.html (§'Run it yourself' step 2)

Paper X coupled coscaling correction verification harness (theorem-to-code consistency and integrator-accuracy suite for the beta greater than k criterion)

python experiment_coscaling.py
pytest test_coscaling.py -q

10/10 internal-consistency checks pass | 0 kill-conditions triggered. F4 (QEC mechanism): suppression is analytically power-law, threshold-form analogy only, not a transferred mechanism. OVERALL: code matches the maths (E1-E9); the model-vs-reality test is the open problem. pytest reports 12 passed.

Repo: github.com/MichaelDariusEastwood/arc-principle-validation/tree/main/papers/Paper-X-Coupled-CoScaling-Correction

Source: research/papers/paper-x-coupled-coscaling-correction.html §11 'The runnable verification harness'

29 further results are published with data paths and code references but no single-command runner on the record yet. They are listed with their sources on the reproducibility page and the data-availability page; runners join this page as they are cut, and a result without a runner should be weighed accordingly.

Commands mined from the published pages named on each card, verbatim. If a command here and its source page differ, the page governs.