Michael Darius Eastwood · Research Notes · 3 July 2026 · Part of the Research evidence spine
Michael Darius Eastwood, independent researcher, London: originator of the embedded-correction alignment thesis (manuscript 8 December 2024, SHA-256 anchored: f0d1f38f).
Register entry 16 of 19. Domain: Venture. Institution: Recursive Superintelligence (London). External date: 2026-04-17. Measured against: A1 (~16 months after A1; incorporated Dec 31 2025, 2 days before A3 publication). Classification: CONVERGENT. Primary source: Sifted 2026-04; TechFundingNews
What happened
Recursive Superintelligence: $500M at $4B (GV + Nvidia), 4-month-old company building closed-loop recursive self-improvement; convergent naming with A1's core concept.
Why it is in the register
A company named Recursive Superintelligence raised five hundred million dollars at a four billion valuation to build closed-loop recursive self-improvement, incorporated two days before the book's print publication. The register is precise about what this row claims: convergent naming and convergent mission, no derivation, no awareness. A half-billion-dollar bet on exactly the system class the manuscript analysed, with no published safety architecture, is the strongest possible demonstration that the manuscript was analysing the right thing.
How to check this entry
Open the primary source above. Confirm the date. Confirm the finding. Then compare it against the manuscript passage or artifact named in the register entry, whose SHA-256 hash is published on the evidence page. Nothing in this article asks for trust; the entry either survives that comparison or it comes off the register, publicly, the way the programme's retracted scaling figure did.
From the book Infinite Architects: Intelligence, Recursion, and the Creation of Everything by Michael Darius Eastwood.