Public Evidence Portal

Supplementary navigational aid to the formal court bundle

This portal contains evidence, analysis, and documentation from active court proceedings involving six interlinked claims across the High Court, County Court, and Court of Appeal.

It is published under the open justice principle established in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417. Court proceedings are public. The evidence is public. This portal organises that evidence so it can be understood.

By proceeding, you acknowledge that:

All content is derived from public court records, filed documents, sealed orders, and the author's own evidence
Names of parties, legal representatives, and judicial officers appear because these are public proceedings in open court
Nothing is published with the intent to harass, intimidate, or prejudice any party

AI Disclosure

This portal was built with the assistance of AI tools. AI was used for organisation, analysis, and presentation of evidence. All factual assertions have been verified by the author against source documents.

The portal includes 'Ask the Case', an AI system that strips all party names and judge identities before analysis so it cannot be biased toward either side. Every question is evaluated by multiple independent AI models and stress-tested by a simulated panel of senior counsel. It answers from evidence only and is not legal advice.

AI-generated content is a tool, not a source of truth. The source documents, sealed orders, filed pleadings, and court transcripts are the evidence. The AI organises them. Where any AI-generated analysis conflicts with a source document, the source document takes precedence.

The author is a litigant in person with ADHD and autism spectrum disorder (Equality Act 2010, s.6). Some content discusses the impact of disability on court proceedings and the systemic failure to provide reasonable adjustments. This disclosure is voluntary and central to the case.

Enter the Evidence Portal Return to main site