{
 "generated": "2026-08-09",
 "redaction_rail": "Rows state the error class and the catch only; no content of any unregistered design is disclosed.",
 "framing": "Six AI systems work on this programme and they are wrong regularly. This register exists because the human checks everything is a claim, and claims here come with receipts.",
 "rows": [
  {
   "date": "2026-08-09",
   "error": "A matching heuristic read a sentence that QUOTED a choice in order to reject it, and set exactly that forbidden choice on a live draft registration's metadata.",
   "caught_by": "The operator-ordered one-by-one manual proofread of every registration document.",
   "fix": "Hand-reviewed table now outranks every heuristic; a sentinel forces operator-decision fields blank; two regression selftests pin the trap; the correction was verified by reading the live draft back from the API."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-09",
   "error": "The bare option word Other substring-matched ordinary prose and wrongly ticked a form choice on about forty-nine draft registrations.",
   "caught_by": "The operator's spot check of a single draft, which triggered a full census.",
   "fix": "Minimum-length guard on option matching; a surgical erase that removes only the tool's own fingerprint; verified by census and direct reads."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-09",
   "error": "A stamped template carried a broken half-sentence into fifty-one registration files, including both patent-held folders.",
   "caught_by": "The manual proofread's garble sweep.",
   "fix": "Repaired estate-wide, mirrored into every source file so the layers cannot drift."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-08",
   "error": "Six automated audits of one question in one day reported wrong answers in BOTH directions, undercounting and overcounting the same corpus.",
   "caught_by": "Reading the documents instead of searching them.",
   "fix": "Became binding canon with two enforced gates: a question about what documents say is settled by reading them; a search settles nothing."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-07",
   "error": "Twenty-six of thirty-two model-supplied book quotations were fabricated.",
   "caught_by": "The character-for-character verbatim law, matched against the published EPUB.",
   "fix": "None shipped; every public quotation now carries verbatim verification against the source edition."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-03",
   "error": "The programme's original headline exponent, 2.24, rested on a harness scoring defect and same-family scorer bias.",
   "caught_by": "Cross-architecture replication under the compliant blinded protocol.",
   "fix": "Public retraction; the robust 0.49 (interval [-1.3, 2.9]) published in its place; the retraction leads the record rather than hiding in it."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-07",
   "error": "An early registration quoted design-sensitivity figures that had been asserted rather than computed; a later one's primary statistic had zero per cent detection when actually simulated.",
   "caught_by": "The measured-not-asserted rule: sensitivity scripts must run and their output be pasted.",
   "fix": "Figures withdrawn and recomputed; the failing primary statistic replaced, with the failure recorded in the registration itself."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08",
   "error": "An unescaped regex dot made the year 2024 match the retracted value 2.24 seven times in one audit.",
   "caught_by": "The fixed-string counting discipline adopted after review.",
   "fix": "Literal matching for numeric audits; the lesson is in the lane's permanent memory."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-09",
   "error": "The assistant's own funder-facing copy claimed every quantity was already frozen, an overclaim false for working-tier drafts that deliberately carry open decision markers.",
   "caught_by": "The operator-ordered second-pass review of the assistant's own packet, before publication.",
   "fix": "Replaced with the per-registration truth; the checker gets checked."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-09",
   "error": "A naive version census produced confident wrong republish verdicts because shared navigation blocks and two different numbering schemes fooled the pattern match.",
   "caught_by": "Reading each page's own title block before reporting, per the read-not-search canon.",
   "fix": "Verdicts corrected; only one paper genuinely needed republishing and it was the one the census had not flagged."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-09",
   "error": "A generated public dataset carried the design titles of the two patent-held studies toward publication.",
   "caught_by": "The receiving lane's pre-publication redaction check, before merge.",
   "fix": "Site copies published counted-but-redacted; the source dataset now redacts at generation so no future copy can re-leak."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-09",
   "error": "The phrase already filed, describing draft registrations that have not yet been submitted, reached canon and a live page.",
   "caught_by": "Cross-checking the phrase against the diligence table's zero-submitted truth.",
   "fix": "Swept at source and on the site to: written, dated and prepared as draft registrations awaiting human submission; the word filed is reserved until submissions begin."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-16",
   "error": "The ceiling law's printed form alpha_crit = 1/gamma ran the wrong way under the paper's own definition of gamma, and its earlier 'derived in the minimal model' status overstated what existed; the defect survived review because 1/gamma and 1/(1-gamma) coincide at exactly one half, the conjectured value.",
   "caught_by": "Two adversarial author-review audits, commissioned and run externally against the statement paper, converged on the defect; direct re-verification against Paper X confirmed it (zero occurrences of alpha_crit).",
   "fix": "Corrected to alpha_crit = 1/(1-gamma), the reciprocal of the correction shortfall, derived in three lines with the correction note printed beside the law (statement paper v4.0, 16 August 2026); COR-2026-08-16-001 on the corrections register; a drafted discrimination study tests away from one half so the error class cannot survive measurement again. The reconciliation claimed here on 17 August covered prose, figures and canon but not the executable model; the row below closes that remainder and corrects this claim."
  },
  {
   "date": "2026-08-21",
   "error": "The 16 August ceiling correction reached every published sentence and stopped at the code. All eight laws pages displayed the corrected ceiling, animated from it, then decided the reader-facing verdict from the superseded form. Across the widget's own slider range 712 of 1681 positions were wrong, 42.4 per cent, half false-safe and half false-alarm. The error inverts at gamma one half, the sliders' home position and the only value where the two forms agree, so nobody who never dragged the slider could see it.",
   "caught_by": "An external scientific ruling commissioned by the author read the live page and reported that the displayed ceiling and the executed rule disagreed; a lane found it independently the same hour. Confirmed by evaluating both expressions across the page's declared range.",
   "fix": "Corrected on all eight pages so the verdict flips where the displayed ceiling is crossed. Guarded by a check that reads the relationship, not the string: it evaluates whatever ceiling and verdict a page declares across that page's own slider range, discovers its pages rather than listing them, reads attributes order-independently because the mirrors alphabetise them, and fails rather than passes when it finds nothing. The ruling's further inference, that the law be suspended, is not adopted: monotonicity under the paper's own definition of gamma, the direction of the ARC Bound and the printed derivation each force 1/(1-gamma) alone. Its separate point, that neither form is derived from a joint model of growth, correction, delay and covariance, stands as an open item."
  }
 ]
}