{
  "generated": "2026-08-08",
  "status": "CLEARED",
  "summary": {
    "raw_candidates": 39,
    "methods_statement_false_positives": 2,
    "negations_or_self_criticism_left_or_softened": 3,
    "corrected": 22,
    "legitimate_universal_claim": 1
  },
  "legitimate": {
    "foundational.tex": "\"alpha_seq > alpha_par for every model tested\" is a TRUE universal claim, confirmed across all architectures in Paper II. It is a different claim from alpha_par ~ 0, which is NOT universal (Gemini 3 Flash = 0.31, r^2 = 0.93). Left as written."
  },
  "not_part_of_this": "The alpha = 2.24 alarm. Those 57 occurrences are MENTIONS -- the papers discussing their own retraction -- and two lanes reported them as survivals before either opened a file. The HTML discusses that retraction MORE thoroughly than the LaTeX, 23 to 14 in paper-ii, which inverts the stale-pipeline story entirely.",
  "method": "Every passage read at source before it was touched. prohibition_context.py for mention-exemption, plus corpus-specific markers, plus a false-positive guard for methods statements about confounds."
}