<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Corrections - Michael Darius Eastwood</title>
<link>https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/</link>
<atom:link href="https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
<description>Every public correction, retraction and withdrawal in the ARC and Eden research programme, as a feed. A body of work that contains no corrections is not a body of work; subscribe to the part most sites hide.</description>
<language>en-gb</language>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 12:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
<item><title>AQ-022: provenance wording (retracted)</title><link>https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/#aq-022</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/AQ-022</guid><pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>The provenance note at the end has been corrected for accuracy. No claim, date, result or status has changed.</description></item>
<item><title>AQ-016: retracted result (retracted)</title><link>https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/#aq-016</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/AQ-016</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>The earlier α ≈ 2.24 estimate was retracted; current pages must refer to the correction record rather than present it as an established scaling law.</description></item>
<item><title>AQ-017: withdrawn significance claim (retracted)</title><link>https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/#aq-017</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/AQ-017</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>The earlier Fisher-combined figure (p approximately 6.3 x 10^-21) was withdrawn because a Fisher combination assumes the component tests are independent, and independence among them was never established; the figure is retained only as part of the correction history.</description></item>
<item><title>AQ-018: priority overstatement (unsupported)</title><link>https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/#aq-018</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/AQ-018</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>The programme reports its own experiments and dated publication record; it does not claim an unqualified first experimental validation across the field.</description></item>
<item><title>AQ-019: concept originality overstatement (retracted)</title><link>https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/#aq-019</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/AQ-019</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>The programme presents 37 named concepts; that count is not a claim that every underlying category was absent from prior literature.</description></item>
<item><title>AQ-020: provenance overstatement (partially-supported)</title><link>https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/#aq-020</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/AQ-020</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>The record contains a visible Gmail origination time, sender-DKIM verification against captured keys and SHA-256 anchors; it is an existence-by-date record, not an RFC 3161 timestamp or proof of authorship by DKIM alone.</description></item>
<item><title>AQ-021: convergence count (partially-supported)</title><link>https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/#aq-021</link><guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.michaeldariuseastwood.com/research/corrections/AQ-021</guid><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate><description>The site records a versioned set of related external developments and classifies each relationship; the count must be generated from the current register and must not be described as independent replication unless that status is established.</description></item>
</channel>
</rss>
