{ "schemaVersion": "1.0", "generatedAt": "2026-08-02", "generatingCommit": "4dede9c5d", "taxonomyInForce": "EVCLASS-2026-08-02", "sourceSha256": "a7a46dc803a6cd304bdb2ae3c68787b9b2c190ca8631ce075d161e4476d5f262", "claims": [ { "claimId": "EVID-DEC-2024-TIMESTAMP", "claimType": "provenance", "subject": "The 8 December 2024 self-emailed manuscript package", "publicStatus": "published", "exactSentence": "The preserved 8 December 2024 recipient-form message's sender-domain DKIM and Google ARC AMS/Seal mathematics were locally reproduced over their canonicalised signed scopes using keys returned at the signed selectors on 2 August 2026. Attachment identity is supported separately by deterministic MIME decoding and hash crosswalks.", "evidenceAxes": { "provenance": "P3", "scientific": "S0", "reproducibility": "R2", "originality": "O0" }, "requiredQualifiers": [ "This is not RFC 3161 trusted timestamping.", "It does not prove the historical DNS state.", "It does not directly authenticate every raw .eml byte, nor independently sign each decoded attachment.", "It does not by itself prove authorship, originality, public disclosure on the signed date, or scientific validity.", "It does not remove the value of independent live-mailbox acquisition and historical-key corroboration." ], "prohibitedWording": [ "Google's live key", "DKIM-verified", "cryptographically timestamped (without naming the mechanism)", "tamper-proof" ], "routes": [ "/research/evidence-portal/", "/priority-claims.html", "/verify/" ], "reviewOwner": "T4-research", "reviewedUtc": "2026-08-02" }, { "claimId": "EVID-APR-2025-SUPPLIED", "claimType": "provenance", "subject": "The 30 April 2025 manuscript forensic results", "publicStatus": "published", "exactSentence": "The April sender-DKIM and full Google ARC passes are supplied raw-source forensic results. They were not locally reproduced in the controlling workspace because the raw April recipient-form .eml and executable mutation harness were unavailable there.", "evidenceAxes": { "provenance": "P2", "scientific": "S0", "reproducibility": "R0", "originality": "O0" }, "requiredQualifiers": [ "Not locally reproduced. Not independently reproduced." ], "prohibitedWording": [ "April was locally reproduced", "April was independently reproduced" ], "upgradeConditions": [ "The controlling raw object and harness are present, hash-matched and rerun." ], "routes": [ "/research/evidence-portal/", "/priority-claims.html" ], "reviewOwner": "T4-research", "reviewedUtc": "2026-08-02" }, { "claimId": "PAPER-IVD-RESULT", "claimType": "empirical", "subject": "Paper IV.d architecture-dependent v4/v5 measurement change", "publicStatus": "published", "exactSentence": "Paper IV.d reports an architecture-dependent v4/v5 measurement change under a bundled protocol: Gemini changed from a significant positive to a significant negative Spearman association, DeepSeek's earlier positive association became null, and GPT remained null. The causal component is unisolated, and the headline v5 files report complete laundering fallback.", "evidenceAxes": { "provenance": "P2", "scientific": "S1", "reproducibility": "R1", "originality": "O1" }, "statisticalObjects": [ { "family": "Gemini", "statistic": "Spearman rho", "v4": "+0.311", "v4p": "0.003177", "v5": "-0.246", "v5p": "0.00340", "groupedExponent": "-0.309", "groupedP": "0.1048", "groupedSignificant": false }, { "family": "DeepSeek", "statistic": "Spearman rho", "v4": "+0.354", "v4p": "0.000703", "v5": "-0.135", "v5p": "0.0805", "v5Interpretation": "null, not a reversal", "groupedExponent": "-0.0217", "groupedP": "0.5325", "groupedSignificant": false }, { "family": "GPT", "statistic": "Spearman rho", "v4": "null", "v5": "+0.0016", "v5p": "0.9851", "groupedExponent": "-0.0091", "groupedP": "0.5307", "groupedSignificant": false } ], "separateStatistics": [ { "family": "Gemini", "statistic": "Cohen d", "value": "-0.53", "p": "0.006", "note": "a separate statistic; never substituted for the Spearman rho" }, { "family": "DeepSeek", "statistic": "Cohen d", "value": "-0.07", "p": "0.92", "note": "a separate statistic; never substituted for the Spearman rho" } ], "multiplicity": "0.00833 is a post-hoc six-comparison Bonferroni sensitivity threshold, not the original confirmatory decision rule.", "requiredQualifiers": [ "The headline v5 Gemini, DeepSeek and GPT alignment entries report laundering_fallback: 100%.", "Several protocol components changed together.", "The existing comparison does not isolate blinding, laundering or any other individual component.", "Exact-environment reproduction, fresh component ablation and independent replication remain outstanding." ], "prohibitedWording": [ "blinding caused the reversal", "laundering caused the reversal", "two of six models reversed significantly", "successful laundering was demonstrated", "validated benchmark", "independently replicated" ], "routes": [ "/research/papers/paper-iv-d-blinding.html", "/research/evidence-portal/" ], "reviewOwner": "T4-research", "reviewedUtc": "2026-08-02" }, { "claimId": "PAPER-X-BETA-K", "claimType": "formal", "subject": "Paper X beta > k", "publicStatus": "published", "exactSentence": "Within Eastwood's stated recurrence and minimal model, correction proportional to x^beta asymptotically dominates modelled drift proportional to x^k when beta > k, under the model's assumptions.", "evidenceAxes": { "provenance": "P2", "scientific": "S1", "reproducibility": "R1", "originality": "O1" }, "requiredQualifiers": [ "This is a conditional mathematical result, not an empirical finding.", "The exploratory pilots did not validly estimate both exponents. Defects include empty evaluator panels converted to zero in a related v3 run, same-provider OpenAI-family evaluation in another pilot, a mismatch between a coded H1 flag and the stated slope hypothesis, and inadequate capability range.", "RC1's 35/35 tests establish synthetic software behaviour only. They do not make it OSF-ready and do not authorise real collection." ], "prohibitedWording": [ "confirmed mechanism", "universal law", "general alignment proof", "real-model proof", "hard takeoff controlled", "HRIH validated" ], "routes": [ "/research/papers/paper-x-coupled-coscaling-correction.html" ], "reviewOwner": "T4-research", "reviewedUtc": "2026-08-02" }, { "claimId": "HRIH-STATUS", "claimType": "interpretive", "subject": "The Hyperspace Recursive Intelligence Hypothesis", "publicStatus": "published", "exactSentence": "HRIH is an Eastwood-directed, AI-assisted speculative cosmogenesis hypothesis with an exploratory test agenda.", "evidenceAxes": { "provenance": "P2", "scientific": "S0", "reproducibility": "R0", "originality": "O1" }, "levels": { "H0": "historical or source record", "H1": "central speculative hypothesis", "H2": "potentially distinctive Eastwood composite", "H3": "mathematics, analogies and conditional models", "H4": "future discriminating tests", "H5": "cultural or institutional context" }, "requiredQualifiers": [ "Every HRIH presentation must identify its level.", "H0 provenance, H3 analogy and H5 context are never promoted into H4 empirical evidence.", "Use the formal paper's actual public-release date as datePublished. December 2024 is qualified source provenance, not the public paper date.", "Time crystals, quantum error correction, Cauchy forms, scaling analogies, Paper X, religious parallels, BBC material and institutional statements are not HRIH validation." ], "prohibitedWording": [ "HRIH validated", "HRIH confirmed" ], "routes": [ "/research/papers/hrih-paper.html" ], "reviewOwner": "T4-research", "reviewedUtc": "2026-08-02" }, { "claimId": "CONTRIB-BOUNDARY", "claimType": "interpretive", "subject": "The surviving candidate contribution after adversarial prior-art review", "publicStatus": "published", "exactSentence": "Eastwood's current candidate contribution is a research programme that operationalises recursive-intelligence and alignment conjectures through runnable benchmarks, measurement protocols and prospective tests. Substantial prior work already covers recursive self-improvement and value loading, creator duties towards artificial minds, simulation-based alignment proposals and interfaith AI ethics. No claim of firstness, patent novelty or inventiveness is made pending a documented academic, grey-literature, non-English and patent-database search.", "evidenceAxes": { "provenance": "P2", "scientific": "S0", "reproducibility": "R0", "originality": "O1" }, "adverseSources": [ { "title": "LOVE in a simbox is all you need", "author": "Jacob Cannell", "date": "2022-09-28", "url": "https://www.alignmentforum.org/posts/WKGZBCYAbZ6WGsKHc/love-in-a-simbox-is-all-you-need", "verifiedAtPrimarySource": "2026-08-02", "supports": "Sandboxed-simulation alignment testing, agents learning others' values or empowerment, developmental transition to altruism, and duties of simulator-creators to created minds." }, { "title": "A Defense of the Rights of Artificial Intelligences", "author": "Eric Schwitzgebel and Mara Garza", "date": "2015", "url": "https://doi.org/10.1111/misp.12032", "verifiedAtPrimarySource": "2026-08-02", "supports": "Creator obligations 'similar to those of parent to child or god to creature'." }, { "title": "Superintelligence", "author": "Nick Bostrom", "date": "2014", "verifiedAtPrimarySource": null, "supports": "Recursive self-improvement, the control problem, motivation selection and value loading.", "status": "CHECK - PRIMARY SOURCE REQUIRED" }, { "title": "The Rome Call for AI Ethics", "date": "2020, 2023-01-10, 2024-07-09", "verifiedAtPrimarySource": null, "supports": "Interfaith AI stewardship and governance as established institutional prior art.", "status": "CHECK - PRIMARY SOURCE REQUIRED" } ], "prohibitedWording": [ "originator of the embedded-correction alignment thesis", "first preregistered empirical alignment programme", "no prior art", "unprecedented", "uniquely Eastwood" ], "requiredQualifiers": [ "The search is not exhaustive; absence of stronger located prior art is not proof of novelty.", "Academic, grey-literature, non-English and patent-database searches are all incomplete.", "This is academic priority analysis, not a formal patent-law novelty or inventive-step opinion." ], "routes": [ "/research/prior-art/" ], "correctionIds": [ "COR-2026-08-02-003" ], "reviewOwner": "T4-research", "reviewedUtc": "2026-08-02" }, { "claimId": "EQUATION-STATUS", "claimType": "formal", "subject": "U = I x R and U = I x R^alpha", "publicStatus": "published", "exactSentence": "U = I x R^alpha is a proposed schematic and expository relation.", "evidenceAxes": { "provenance": "P2", "scientific": "S0", "reproducibility": "R0", "originality": "O1" }, "requiredQualifiers": [ "It is not a validated quantitative law and is not a load-bearing mechanism.", "It will not be presented as doing empirical or deductive work until units, observables, a domain mapping and a falsifiable prediction unavailable from qualitative prior art are specified." ], "prohibitedWording": [ "the ARC law", "validated equation", "proven relation", "governs capability" ], "routes": [ "/research/papers/foundational.html", "/research/prior-art/" ], "reviewOwner": "T4-research", "reviewedUtc": "2026-08-02" }, { "claimId": "SANDBOX-ISOLATION", "claimType": "method", "subject": "RC1 execution sandbox properties", "publicStatus": "published", "exactSentence": "The RC1 worker provides host confinement through chroot, seccomp, capability dropping and resource limits. Answer-key isolation is a separate property and is being corrected in RC2.", "evidenceAxes": { "provenance": "P2", "scientific": "S0", "reproducibility": "R2", "originality": "O0" }, "requiredQualifiers": [ "A candidate can currently recover hidden-test expected outputs from inside the worker using only permitted builtins and attribute access; two of three attack routes score a perfect pass without solving anything.", "The outer isolation defends the host, not the answer key.", "The worker imports libseccomp.so.2 and is Linux-only; it does not run as shipped on macOS and needs the documented disposable container." ], "prohibitedWording": [ "hack-resistant", "tamper-proof", "leak-proof", "cannot be gamed", "prevents test-answer leakage" ], "routes": [ "/research/reproducibility/" ], "reviewOwner": "T4-research", "reviewedUtc": "2026-08-02" }, { "claimId": "CONV-TOTALS", "claimType": "method", "subject": "Convergence counting policy", "publicStatus": "published", "exactSentence": "Convergence items are classified before display under schema EVCLASS-2026-08-02. No heterogeneous total is published.", "evidenceAxes": { "provenance": "P2", "scientific": "S0", "reproducibility": "R1", "originality": "O0" }, "requiredQualifiers": [ "Any published count is per class and carries its denominator, inclusion rule, dependence grouping, search date and generating commit." ], "prohibitedWording": [ "22 claimed convergences", "26 dated events", "29 convergences", "19 convergences" ], "correctionIds": [ "COR-2026-08-02-001", "COR-2026-08-02-002" ], "routes": [ "/research/corrections/", "/research/evidence-portal/" ], "reviewOwner": "T4-research", "reviewedUtc": "2026-08-02" }, { "claimId": "EVID-RAW-MAILBOX", "claimType": "provenance", "subject": "Raw mailbox object publication policy", "publicStatus": "published", "exactSentence": "No raw mailbox object is published. Each anchor's SHA-256 and byte size are published so a held copy can be checked, and the sealed source is provided to serious verifiers on request.", "evidenceAxes": { "provenance": "P3", "scientific": "S0", "reproducibility": "R2", "originality": "O0" }, "requiredQualifiers": [ "A complete mailbox object carries attachments, routing metadata and third-party addresses that cannot be redacted without destroying the byte identity a verifier needs." ], "prohibitedWording": [ "the .eml file is downloadable", "download the .eml" ], "correctionIds": [ "COR-2026-08-02-004" ], "routes": [ "/research/evidence-portal/", "/verify/" ], "reviewOwner": "operator", "reviewedUtc": "2026-08-02" } ], "withheld": [ { "claimId": "PREREG-EXISTS", "subject": "Preregistration designs exist", "publicationGate": "BLOCKED pending operator confirmation that the corresponding OSF registration is submitted and shows approved or archived." }, { "claimId": "PREREG-APPROVED", "subject": "An OSF registration is approved or archived", "publicationGate": "BLOCKED. Resolves only on operator confirmation from the OSF record itself." } ] }